Sometimes a fight is overhyped in a head-scratching manner. In fact, if you weren’t around at the time you’d scratch you head at why it was considered a big deal. Figured we could explore this topic. I hope our cognoscenti will provide more than just two names and actually explore how and why it was hyped and why that was just way too much. I will start us off. Gerry Cooney vs John ‘Dino’ Denis: I am not making this up — this was, in 1979, hyped as a big deal. Denis was not, really, Gerry’s best opponent to this point (Eddie ‘Animal’ Lopez or even, arguably, Tom Prater had better credentials) but a few factors went into this being considered a fairly major fight: 1) It was Cooney’s debut at Madison Square Garden (the big arena — he had fought at the Felt Forum). 2) Denis had a pretty 35-2-1 record 3) Dino was Italian-born, so it played well into the Irish-Italian rivalry and fan bases, was out of New England (having fought often in Rhode Island and some in Massachusetts) — kind of close enough to kindle the New York-Boston rivalry vibes — and had also fought several times in New York, so had ‘proven’ himself to some degree to the NY locals. But really, his record looks pretty much like a Peter McNeely type. Very protected. On his way up he beat some carefully selected names (or maybe semi-names) in Scott LeDoux, Jose King Roman and Terry Daniels who weren’t exactly all that — along with a variety of opponents who may as well have been named Dusty Trunks, Kenny Breathe and Chip Panzee. He stepped up twice, getting destroyed in three rounds by George Foreman and losing by decision to Leroy. Jones in his next fight. Then he went on a 3-year, 7-fight rebuilding project against nobodies before fighting Cooney. It wasn’t surprising that Cooney busted him up and stopped Dino in three. What was surprising is that the result was hyped as if Gerry had beaten a bona fide contender. The NY press (and, to a slightly lesser degree, boxing magazines) gave it major coverage and literally proclaimed that Cooney had established himself as a major heavyweight title threat … because he beat Dino Denis. I’m sure I will think of others, but let’s see what you guys come up with.
Bruno v Bugner. The hype was real hot. All this Aussie Joe crap with the press and Frank plays the British hero. Joe as expected took the money and ran .A big fight in Britain made out nothing much.
They say in all of the black, Hispanic and Asian communities, really, there's nothing which captures the imagination or intrigue of the public more than the heated rivalry between the Italians and the Irish. I believe it was Larry Holmes himself who, when asked about the racialized language around Ali and Frazier in the first bout that what was really important was which fighter would be Italian and which fighter would be Irish, were both fighters Caucasian. He further stated that he did assume Ali would be black Irish and Frazier some kind of Italian type. And that THAT would've been exciting.
Ali and Frazier both fought Quarry twice so they are equally Irish. But I never heard rocky Graziano say that either of them was Italian. So it was 2 Irish guys- honorary Irish at that- fighting. No wonder there has never been much interest in the Ali v Frazier fights.
Personally, I believe Holmes vs Cooney was overhyped. For all the wrong reasons.... Don King played the race card, feeding off of America's racial animus. Today, Most blame King for the racial hard feelings created during the build up of the fight. But King was simply a opertunis . He knew what most Americans wanted to see, played on that deep seated racism, and delivered one of the biggest fights in history. Made a ton of money in the process...
Meh... as Don said, Black plus White equals Green. Nothing new under the sun as far as ethnic rivalries. I've heard it from my black, brown, yellow, red and white friends. You and I can not care (or case so much) but others do. We are a base species.
Tyson v Lewis….anyone who was in the know on the sport knew Tyson was losing. The casuals were excited though. Lewis v Grant…Lewis must have an excellent pr team. Waste of time, these are in my life time I wasn’t arriving for Cooney v Holmes
I admit, having grown up in Poland, I don't necessarily understand how these things work. There was too much sameness that shielded me from the machinations you're discussing. But I am continuing to learn, despite it being early in the process.
I'm going bold here, but if we are talking about overhyped fights, I would throw Hagler vs. Hearns in there. It was an incredible 1st round between two of the greatest P4P fighters of all time, but it fizzled rapidly, and then Hearns was spent by the 3rd. It was over before it properly started; I've never been sold on how high it ranks. I also think that once you delve into the first round, there weren't that many big, clean shots landed, especially by Hearns; even as a standalone round I don't think it has the same captivating elements of round 10 of Corrales vs Castillo, for instance, there was no jeopardy apart from when Hagler was mildly hurt for a few seconds. It's not even in my top 2 fights between the Four Kings, I would much rather watch Duran vs Leonard 1 and Hearns vs Leonard 1.
Bobby Chacon-Ruben Olivares II Olivares took Chacon´s undefeated record in their 1st fight. Superb performance. Chacon rebounded with 7 straight kos including a thrilling 9th round win over undefeated future World champion Danny Lopez (who would ko Olivares+Hafey) and win the world title and make one defense. Olivares would get shocklingly koed by dangerous Art Hafey in 5 in his next fight, get off the floor to beat Hafey in return. Win the featherweight title, box superbly in his 1st defense against Arguello (relatively unknown at the time) before being koed violently in the 13th. So the rematch was primed, Chacon was pre-fight favourite to reverse his only loss, the Gate for the fight was a California record for the time. What happened? Chacon struggling with weight, had nothing. Destroyed in 2 humiliating rounds. This content is protected