Joe Walcott vs Zora Folley, Clevelend Williams and Eddie Machen

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Flavius, Jul 17, 2026.

?

Joe Walcott vs Zora Folley, Clevelend Williams and Eddie Machen

  1. Beats all of them

    10 vote(s)
    62.5%
  2. Loses to all of them

    4 vote(s)
    25.0%
  3. Beats Folley; loses to Williams and Machen

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. Beats Williams; loses to Folley and Machen

    1 vote(s)
    6.3%
  5. Beats Machen; loses to Folley and Williams

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. Beats Folley and Williams; loses to Machen

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. Beats Williams and Machen; loses to Folley

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. Beats Folley and Machen; loses to Williams

    1 vote(s)
    6.3%
  1. Kid Bacon

    Kid Bacon All-Time-Fat Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2011
    Messages:
    8,373
    Likes Received:
    10,165
    If it is peak versus peak, then I am confident the best Walcott beats most or all of them.
     
    Gazelle Punch likes this.
  2. PRW94

    PRW94 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2020
    Messages:
    2,324
    Likes Received:
    4,069
    Really prime Walcott could easily go 3-0 and I picked him to go 3-0 even though I think he could stumble against one of these opponents.
     
  3. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,530
    Likes Received:
    9,326
    Machen Folley and Williams lost to a lot of 50s guys. Some of you deny simple realities you could see on boxrec.
     
  4. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2017
    Messages:
    17,394
    Likes Received:
    12,797
    Walcott at his best could likely beat any one of them. However, like others have mentioned, he tended to be inconsistent. And a lacksaidasal version of Walcott can lose to any one of them as well. All in all though, he was pretty consistent from 1945-47
     
    Kid Bacon likes this.
  5. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2017
    Messages:
    17,394
    Likes Received:
    12,797
    Yes, they were good fighters, but let's not get carried away on two fronts. One, making them out to be equivalents to ATG world beaters simply because they lost to Liston who lost to Muhammad Ali. Second, making them the equivalent to the super heavyweight dreadnoughts that came along later. Size wise, Folley, Machen and Williams would not have been out of place in the 1930s and 1940s. They were no bigger than the heavyweights of those eras. Williams would be bigger than most like he was in his actual time but he's no Riddick Bowe or Anthony Joshua.
     
    Kid Bacon likes this.