Primo Carnera's best wins. He was actually a good world level heavyweight

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Aug 9, 2026.


  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,441
    12,863
    Sep 21, 2017
    Jack Sharkey
    Tommy Loughran
    Ernie Schaaf
    King Levinsky
    Paulino Uzcudun
    Young Stribling

    Not a bad line up.
     
  2. PopPellegrino

    PopPellegrino Active Member Full Member

    690
    815
    Feb 21, 2026
    I find it funny that people on this site will praise Joe Louis' resume and explain how, H2H, he's one of the best fighters ever, but then in the next breath trash every heavyweight he fought to build said resume.

    I know you get a lot of **** for your opinion on Tony Galento, but I agree with you. He deserves more credit. He hurt Louis in the first round and dropped him in the third. Galento also shows resemblance to David Tua in the way he fought.

    Now, I do believe H2H that the 1930s and 1940s were a weak era for heavyweights. However, I don't claim to have much knowledge of the pre-Louis era, and even then, I'm no scholar of the 1930s and 40s. I do think Joe Louis would lose to some heavyweights who I wouldn't consider elite.

    That doesn't mean the heavyweights of that time were bad, though. Many of them were skilled and polished because they fought so frequently. Primo Carnera is somewhat of a different case because even during his own era, he was considered a poor champion. Still, he had a decent jab and was solid in the clinch, and people should give him the same basic respect as any other champion because he didn't choose the era he fought in.
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2026
  3. MixedMartialLaw

    MixedMartialLaw Combat sports enthusiast Full Member

    2,324
    3,696
    Jun 30, 2021
    You're thinking of Galento.
     
    PopPellegrino likes this.
  4. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Loyal Member

    31,696
    42,595
    Jul 4, 2014
    Others will know his story better than I, but apparently , he had a first run which was almost entirely fictional, even to himself. He was led to believe that he had a level of power and ability that was just not there via fixed fights.

    To his credit, when he realized that he wasn't that good, he worked on getting better, by actually using his size in a productive way. He was never a classic puncher, but could bludgeon a man to death if he got him trapped in the corner. He was never a classic boxer, but could use his size and reach. His chin was always problematic, but maybe not as bad as has been made out, and it was partially balanced by the fact that he could take it to the body all night long. And he was strong as hell in the clinches, not only from being big, but from being a trained wrestler.

    He earned his place in boxing history, despite the fact that a lot of the early wins were dodgy.

    Or so I understand the story.
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2026
  5. PopPellegrino

    PopPellegrino Active Member Full Member

    690
    815
    Feb 21, 2026
    I did forget to mention the fixed fights, but from what I've heard, I do think that aspect is overstated. Still, all valid points.
     
    catchwtboxing likes this.
  6. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Loyal Member

    31,696
    42,595
    Jul 4, 2014
    Again, they were early on, from what I understand.
     
    PopPellegrino likes this.
  7. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,000
    2,253
    Sep 9, 2011
    he was dog**** and his fights were fixed. not just early on, basically his whole career.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  8. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,441
    12,863
    Sep 21, 2017
    No evidence
     
    Jackomano likes this.
  9. KasimirKid

    KasimirKid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,351
    3,553
    Jun 1, 2018
    He was a courageous man and his personal behavior was a credit to the sport and to mankind. I believe he legitimately defeated Jack Sharkey and should therefore be remembered as a true lineal champion.
     
  10. Andre2000

    Andre2000 Member Full Member

    378
    548
    Jun 26, 2026
    Da Preem wasn’t as bad as some would have it but then again that “some” probably couldn’t rate him any worse than they do, totally bottoming out on old Satchel Feet.

    If for nothing else I give Primo an A+ for the courage he displayed in his very real fights against Baer and Louis.

    I’m among those (however many we number) who can’t buy into the legitimacy of his KO of Sharkey.

    I mean, in all possibility, maybe legit but I remain more doubtful than not.

    Suffice to say, Sharkey KD’d and whipped Primo in their first fight.

    I know Sharks denied any fix until the day he died so I guess I’m doubting his word also.

    I should also qualify that Sharks lost his next 2-3 fights before hanging them up for a few years.

    I know Sharkey was always very fond of the almighty dollar and he made some very good coin via wise investments which allowed he and his family to live more than comfortably later in life.

    One obvious question would be to wonder if anyone could’ve offered him sufficient money as at the time to part ways with the title?
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2026
    Fireman Fred, swagdelfadeel and mcvey like this.
  11. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,075
    6,116
    Jan 6, 2024
    Of course. Just about the best jabber that size. And he also had one punch KO power.

    Carnera also finished his top flight career at age 29. He compares very well with "act 1" Wladimir Klitschko.
     
    slash likes this.
  12. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,441
    12,863
    Sep 21, 2017
    I don't believe any particular fight was fixed unless there's good evidence for such. And that uppercut looked pretty solid to me.
     
  13. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,441
    12,863
    Sep 21, 2017
    The heavies of the 30s and 40s, at least the top echelon, was good as any solid contenders. It's just that many are undersized relative to 80s and beyond heavyweights. What made Karl Mildenberger better than Max Schmeling for instance?
     
    PopPellegrino likes this.
  14. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,075
    6,116
    Jan 6, 2024
    Interesting stat Carnera's record against HW's weighing 210 or more is 36-0. 215 or more his record is 31-0 and 220 or more it's 23-0.

    Carnera was losing to Godfrey who he beat via DQ. But only 2 of the other 35 wins were decisions.
     
  15. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,000
    2,253
    Sep 9, 2011
    apart from the obvious facts that are well documented.

    this isn't greb or langford. there is plenty of footage and he looks **** in every second of it.

    you think hulk hogan was a great fighter too i guess.
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2026
    swagdelfadeel and Mike Cannon like this.