Make the best (in your opinion) HW decade

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ikrasevic, Sep 3, 2026 at 11:10 AM.


  1. ikrasevic

    ikrasevic War for Souls Full Member

    9,149
    9,557
    Nov 3, 2021
    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  2. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,201
    6,247
    Jan 6, 2024
    32-42 or 15-25.

    The 70s can't really be buffed that much by changing around the years. Now you've got to take out Holmes. And you get Terrell and old Liston in exchange.
     
    ikrasevic likes this.
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,225
    53,696
    Feb 11, 2005
    Laughable.

    1992-2002
     
    NoNeck, ikrasevic and Brian1980 like this.
  4. Fogger

    Fogger Father, grandfather and big sports fan. Full Member

    9,813
    16,034
    Aug 9, 2021
    I'll go from 1926 to 1935. You get both Dempsey - Tunney fights plus five different undisputed heavyweight titlists in the 1930s.
     
    Jel, slash and ikrasevic like this.
  5. Brian1980

    Brian1980 Member Full Member

    104
    207
    May 12, 2024
    I think this is spot on, but I’m biased since I was obsessed with heavyweight boxing during this time.
    Tyson, Bowe, Lewis, Holyfield, comeback Foreman and Holmes, Morrison, Briggs, Tua, Golota, Mercer, Rahman, McCall….
     
    slash and ikrasevic like this.
  6. Jakub79

    Jakub79 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,513
    1,605
    Mar 3, 2024
    The 1968–78 era—and in my opinion, nothing else comes close.
    We have the Ali-Frazier trilogy featuring two classics, the Rumble in the Jungle, the "mother of all wars" between Foreman and Lyle, and finally, the magnificent Holmes-Norton fight that saw the birth of a new champion. Ultimately, we have four outstanding heavyweights in their prime who fought one another.
     
    META5, Fogger, Jel and 2 others like this.
  7. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,691
    20,183
    Apr 3, 2012
    If 99 isn’t part of it, it’s not the right list (Lewis, Holyfield, Tyson, Ike, Tua, Byrd, Vitali, Wlad, Sanders, Rahman, Grant. Golota).
     
    Brian1980 likes this.
  8. Jakub79

    Jakub79 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,513
    1,605
    Mar 3, 2024
    What major fights took place in 1999? What classics—comparable to Ali vs. Frazier, Ali vs. Foreman, or Holmes vs. Norton—did you watch back then? Which boxer looked like a force of nature on the level of the 1971 Frazier or the 1973 Foreman? Which victory was as epic as Ali’s win in Kinshasa?
     
  9. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,691
    20,183
    Apr 3, 2012
    I was going off depth, but off the top of my head…Lewis—Holy I and II, Grant vs. Golota, Harris vs. Jefferson, Ike vs. Byrd, Tyson vs. Botha, Rahman vs. Maskaev, Briggs vs. Botha, Ike vs. Byrd.
     
  10. Jakub79

    Jakub79 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,513
    1,605
    Mar 3, 2024
    Fair enough, I respect that, but do you really consider those fights classics? I remember the widespread disappointment after both Lewis-Holyfield bouts; the Ike-Byrd fight was completely forgettable; and Golota-Grant was frankly embarrassing. After the Botha-Tyson fight, someone wrote an article saying it was less exciting than watching a cleaner sweep the MGM floor, and most people regretted spending money on that "spectacle." Harris-Jefferson was great, but it was a bit like Knyba-Ruiz—completely inconsequential to history.
     
    META5, Noel857, McGrain and 1 other person like this.
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,832
    51,933
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, the notion that Lewis-Holyfield are classics is a stretch at the very least. The first fight was an aberration and the second one just isn't very good. Technically impressive, close enough to keep you involved, but it never caught fire.
     
  12. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,493
    9,399
    Jul 17, 2009
    I would say 1970s. The fights and fighters names of the decade are explanation enough.
     
    ikrasevic likes this.
  13. ikrasevic

    ikrasevic War for Souls Full Member

    9,149
    9,557
    Nov 3, 2021
    It can't be 1968-78, because that's not a decade, it's 11 years. It can be 1968-77, or 1969-78. Relax, you're not the only one who made that mistake; almost everyone did. Rummy counted the decades as 1990-99, and 2000-2009.
    In this decade that I chose, Holmes is out, but the last year of Ali's first reign falls in.
     
  14. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,611
    9,201
    Oct 8, 2013
    87-97

    You get peak Tyson. As well as the historic upset by Douglas. Then during his incarceration the rise of Holyfield and Bowe in their primes. With great fights. A still formidable Foreman. The Bowe Golota wars. Then as they all fade the incoming Lewis.
     
    ikrasevic likes this.
  15. ikrasevic

    ikrasevic War for Souls Full Member

    9,149
    9,557
    Nov 3, 2021
    It can't be 1987-97, because that's not a decade, it's 11 years. It can be 1987-96, or 1988-97. Relax, you're not the only one who made that mistake; almost everyone did. Rummy counted the decades as 1990-99, and 2000-2009.
    1987
    1988
    1989
    1990
    1991
    1992
    1993
    1994
    1995
    1996
    1997
    That's NOT a decade; that's 11 years.
     
    The Long Count likes this.