Make the best (in your opinion) HW decade

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ikrasevic, Sep 3, 2026.


  1. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,750
    20,209
    Apr 3, 2012
    Basically yes, they were a bunch of really good fights. I’m not going sit here and explain why Grant fighting Golota was great (Foreman quit in Zaire btw) etc.
     
  2. Jakub79

    Jakub79 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,516
    1,610
    Mar 3, 2024
    You don't have to do that. It was a great fight to some extent, though it leaves a bit of a bad taste in my mouth. I didn't watch the *Thrilla in Manila* live; for me, Ali vs. Frazier simply ranked higher—much higher—even though I watched it years later. Just as Ali and Frazier were better, in my view, than Golota and Grant. Best regards.
     
  3. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,750
    20,209
    Apr 3, 2012
    Well, I wasn’t around in the 70s so I can’t name every fight from each of those years and it’s true that the major fights of 99 (Holy—Lewis fights) were good but not classics. What I confident in is that the 99 lineup would mop the floor with any 70s lineup.

    You’ve got four top ten heavyweights of all time in decent condition including a peak Lewis, and another in the top 15 (Vitali), others who would win belts and another who was probably top 20 or 30 h2h (Ike). It was absurd.
     
    Last edited: Sep 5, 2026 at 10:38 AM
  4. Jakub79

    Jakub79 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,516
    1,610
    Mar 3, 2024
    Okay, that’s my mistake. I didn’t know. But no problem—in that case, 1969–1978, and the argument remains exactly the same. Ali, Frazier, Foreman, Holmes, Norton—and right behind them, Lyle, Young, Quarry... it never got any better than that.
     
    slash, Mike Cannon and ikrasevic like this.
  5. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,584
    9,406
    Aug 15, 2018
    Probably 65-75. There’s a lot going on there
     
    ikrasevic likes this.
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,297
    49,751
    Apr 27, 2005
    I'm wondering if people are projecting this sort of thing as cutting off at the start of 97 hence not including it.
     
  7. ikrasevic

    ikrasevic War for Souls Full Member

    9,209
    9,643
    Nov 3, 2021
    I don't know for sure; I'm not inside other people's heads. I tried to explain:
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,276
    53,792
    Feb 11, 2005
    Good Lord, 75-78 was an absolute nadir in the history of the heavyweight division. A bunch of used-up former greats, a head case and a bunch of hacks.
     
  9. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,245
    27,772
    Jan 3, 2007
    ikrasevic, Seamus and slash like this.
  10. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,750
    20,209
    Apr 3, 2012
    mr. magoo likes this.
  11. slash

    slash Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,927
    3,916
    Apr 15, 2012
    You know history do say that.
    You won't get very far with that. Capped by Holmes-Norton.
     
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,276
    53,792
    Feb 11, 2005
    Here's the Ring Top 10 for 1976, headed by an absolutely used up Ali who was banking decisions by clowning to the judges and then fighting Eurobums. A head case Foreman who wouldn't get his act straight for a decade. The perennially overrated Norton and then a bunch of hot garbage.

    Muhammad Ali, Champion

    1. George Foreman
    2. Ken Norton
    3. Jimmy Young
    4. Duane Bobick
    5. Ron Lyle
    6. Larry Holmes
    7. Howard Smith
    8. Johnny Boudreaux
    9. Stan Ward
    10. Joe Bugner
    Here is two years later, an even worse Ali, a worse Norton still holding top spots and yet more hot garbage.

    Muhammad Ali, Champion

    1. Larry Holmes
    2. Ken Norton
    3. Leon Spinks
    4. Ron Lyle
    5. Jimmy Young
    6. Kallie Knoetze
    7. Alfredo Evangelista
    8. Gerrie Coetzee
    9. Ossie Ocasio
    10. Domingo D'Elia
     
    slash likes this.
  13. slash

    slash Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,927
    3,916
    Apr 15, 2012
    I thought first Tyson era was pretty ****
     
  14. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,276
    53,792
    Feb 11, 2005
    Underrated era to be honest, filled with top level and well groomed talent.
     
  15. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing

    25,305
    19,857
    Apr 26, 2006