Crawford vs Lara at 154: Who would've won.

Let's say you switch the Madrimov who fought Crawford with the Lara who fought Canelo and Paul Williams. How do you see this fight playing out? Madrimov is much more talented than Lara, but Lara had much more experience at a similar age.

 

Lara

 

Lara is a stylistical problem but Crawford most likely finds a way

 

Why do you think so?

 

His style Canelo and Spence are tailored made for Crawford both have slow footwork Canelo has good upper body movement but Crawford long arms negate that Lara don't mind stinking up the place has a long reach and ain't afraid to put on the track spikes

 

Madrimov has a style symilar to Lara and Crawford handled him well.

 

Lara is better has the same reach as Crawford moves better

 

I'm not even sure. I just think for the reasons you mentioned you're getting a lot better version of Lara than you are with Madrimov. I never saw either of those fights. So **** knows.

 

I’m still surprised he is a current belt holder! Who would have thought he’d be holding a strap more than a decade after he fought Canelo?

 

Crawford more dog. Lara wouldnt turn it up after about round 8 or so. He would try to coast like he did against canelo

 

But is the lara who fought canelo and Paul Williams better than Madrimov

 

Lara is on a whole different level to Madrimov, who was overrated by Crawford fans. Lara is also a worse style match up and has longer arms than Madrimov. And Crawford only very narrowly beat Madrimov. So I'm going with Lara to win in a bit of a stinker.

 

Mmmm Madrimov is.more versatile and better at marking adjustments

 

Probably Crawford because of the aggression. Close decision for Bud.

 

We've seen what Lara does to agressive fighter aka Paul Williams and Canelo (AT 154)