WARRIORS HEART doc about why boxers are turning to bare knuckle

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by porkypara, Sep 13, 2026.


  1. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,810
    29,594
    Jul 26, 2004
    BKB is the new king of combat sports for me personally. Has really opened my eyes to how much difference not having even small mma gloves on makes in a real fight.

    In some ways it sucks because it has shown a light on how artificial modern boxing is, and how artificial some of the revered heirchary is in boxing, even historically. And now that Ive seen it it can't be unseen. (For me).

    There's also something just different about the the level of grit and hardness it takes, that reminds me of what used to draw me to boxing, is on another level in BKB.

    Watch Hunts last fight.... the level of mental and physical toughness to win that fight, and the level of hard you have to be, for me personally it really 'seperates the men from the boys' so to speak.

    Also for all the talk about it preying on the vulnerable, thats one perspective, the other perspective is its giving opportunities for people who dont have better opportunities elsewhere, and are likely thankful for the chance to put paychecks in their families bank account doing what was for them the best financial opportunity they had.

    Not to mention if that bothers someone that bad, hate to say it but combat sports has always been done primarily by the lowest and most vulnerable classes of society.

    As for the damage they take, my view is that many boxers tend to take more brain damage then bkb guys do, and I imagine medical science would likely support that notion. I find it hard to believe that getting punched 160 times over 36 minutes, then 70 times over 10 minutes.

    The worst view of all though is this alarmingly prevalent opinion that it should be banned. Telling two grown men theyre not allowed to fight eachother and get paid for it, because YOU find the sport too violent, is absolutely wild to me. If its not someone's preference or you dont like it, cool... dont watch it, dont support it, ect. But to go beyond that and afvocate for its banning?

    Ill never understand the thinking behind feeling you should be able to dictate to other men what they can and can't do that has nothing to do with you and isnt hurting anyone else.
     
  2. GoodBot

    GoodBot You can like, just forget your password. Full Member

    3,228
    3,907
    Jan 25, 2026
    Let me guess, you support slap fighting too.
     
  3. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,810
    29,594
    Jul 26, 2004
    Hate slap "fighting".

    Wouldn't try telling other grown men theyre not allowed to participate in it because I dont like it though.
     
    MixedMartialLaw likes this.
  4. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,810
    29,594
    Jul 26, 2004
    The promotion is only 8 years old. Exactly how many career fights and "longevity" do you expect people in an 8 year old promotion to have.

    Hunt has 16 fights. He had a serious injury to his arm when falling wrong that caused like a year suspension or more or hed likely be at 18.

    when its all said and done he likely winds up fighting bkb successfully for a decade.

    Undoubtedly would be longer then that had he been younger when bkfc was created.


    Not every sport is made to have a 20 year career in. So what.
    Exactly how much longevity does a sport need to have to be acceptable to you.
     
  5. bbjc

    bbjc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,346
    5,257
    Feb 25, 2012
    It does hurt someone else though. Not only the participant themselves who will end up brain damaged but their family and friends etc also. Combat sports has always attracted the vulnerable. But the sport of boxing has had the time to develop in order to minimise it. Bkb hasnt. Not properly regulated. Drug testing very suspect if any. Pretty much most of them look like their on something. On top of that unlike boxing defending yourself is a lot more difficult with smaller rings and no gloves etc.

    Its desperate people mostly with mental health issues...being used to make a pound note at their expense. Their just so desperate to fix their mental health problems their prepared for brain damage for it.

    Boxing isn,t a great sport granted but it comes down to degrees imo. Its a lot less desperation a lot less mental health problems in comparison and you can actually win at boxing nowadays. No one will win the game of bkb. On top of that who will be paying in years to come when they end up needing care. The guy that earned 2 grand a fight to get his brain spangled. Wouldnt have thought so.
     
  6. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,810
    29,594
    Jul 26, 2004
    Most of this is baseless conjecture (mental health issues, cant win at BK, fighters will need care because of BK, ect), the rest of it (participants recieving brain damage arent the only ones effected) can be applied to boxing as much if not more then it can BK.

    I think if someone cares that much about the impact of fighting on a fighters health, then boxing probably isnt the place for them.
    And they should be holding boxing to the same standard as they do BK.

    It is entirely plausible, backed by objective data, that boxing is even more traumatic on a fighters long term health then BK is. In BK you take less punches, for shorter times, for less fights.

    The idea a typical boxers brain is doing that much better then a BK fighters when theyre taking more punches over longer time frames over the course of more fights, is completely baseless.

    How many tragedies has boxing had in just the last 10 years.

    I think anyone championing boxing over BK is being pretty biased and hypocritical. This entire sport is in the shadow of multiple tragedies every other year that we as its fan base say a couple 'RIP Champ' and then gloss over and look forward to the next best matchup we can while ragging on refs that stop the fights too early.

    I understand BK being too violent for someone. It is a violent sport and it comes with gnarly damage.

    But for someone to cross over from 'eh, i dont care for BK, its too violent for my taste' into 'omg this is so much worse then boxing for a fighters long term health this needs to be banned' is a wide divide and I think if they cared as much about the health of fighters as they say they do then they probably shouldnt be boxing fans in the first place. I think most boxers with observable brain damage, severe CTE, let alone the boxers that have been rendered vegetables, and the ones outright killed, would have traded the visually gross damage that comes from a quick BK fight over the deep brain trauma that can come from 25 minute boxing beatings.
     
    Philosopher and MixedMartialLaw like this.
  7. bbjc

    bbjc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,346
    5,257
    Feb 25, 2012
    The real dangers of bkb wont be seen for another say 20 years. They dont know the real data as its a growing sport thats not really had time to provide real data.

    At that point it will be clear tho.....these people are being exploited in a far more unregulated sport than boxing.

    Boxing has 25000 active boxers. Bkb has 300. If that sport grows then you,ll see the real data and it wont be good.

    I think boxing has its problems and needs to be cleaned up....but bkb is a joke in comparison.
     
  8. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,810
    29,594
    Jul 26, 2004
    There is no objective basis whatsoever to the notion that BK is 'a lot more dangerous' then boxing as a whole. Counting knockdowns isnt the metric you think it is to gauge overall danger level of the sport. The amount of compounding brain trauma that boxers accumulate over the course of 20, 30, or 36 minutes with no knockdowns can easily dwarf the amount of brain trauma that a 10 minute BK fight has that has a couple knockdowns.

    Its the accumilation of brain damage over the course of the fight that is the danger to fighters. Not individual severity of individual shots. Its why almost all of the tragedies in boxing happen after long beatings or prolonged fights, and practically never after an early scary looking knockout.

    The 'safer' nature of boxing is often the underlying detriment to the fighters actual safety.


    Lets look at some of the most recent tragedies in boxing. Im sure Ill miss plenty but should be a decent sample here...

    Eubank vs Blackwell : coma : No knockdowns I dont think : Over 27 minutes of total fighting.
    Sabriel vs Dadashev : killed : No knockdowns I dont think : Over 30 minutes of total fighting.
    Conwell vs Day : killed : took punches for over 15 minutes after being knocked down the first time : Over 27 minutes of total fighting.
    Westgarth vs Spelmen : killed : knocked down towards end of fight : actually won his fight : 30 minutes of total fighting.
    Mntungwa vs Buthelezi : killed : no knockdowns : almost 30 minutes of total fighting.


    The common denominator here isnt knockdowns, its the duration the fighters are taking punches for. Notice how theres no 2 round wars here? Notice how nobody has ever been ko'd so hard in the first couple rounds that they die? On average, its not the single, fight ending punches that are the danger.

    And trust that this trend would continue (fight duration being the common denominator) if we continued to go back to the other prominent tragedies in boxing, kovalev vs simakov, perez vs mago, eubank vs watson, ect, ect

    The notion that these deaths would still have taken place in a 10 minute BK fight, where you are actually less likely to take more punches due to the fight stopping nature of BK punches (from swelling, cuts, or from being kod naturally... ending the fight when it should be ended) and the 10 minute fight cap, would be baseless projection to say the least.

    A brain is supposed to be knocked down or out when hit with a big punch. A face is supposed to become ravaged from strikes. And these natural elements, while looking a lot worse superficially, aid in BK fights having natural endings much sooner then boxing does.

    A brain is not meant to be battered for 30 minutes from punches that are hard enough to damage it, but padded enough to allow the beating to be a drawn out prolonged unnatural beating, where every round compounds upon the damage done in the previous rounds.

    Boxing also makes it easier for hurt fighters to continue fighting on with an already concussed brain, taking rounds and rounds and rounds of additional damage on top of the concussion they already have. This prolonging is directly aided by the nature of large gloves, and is made worse by the duration of fight times in boxing.

    Boxing allows for the unnatural prolonging of beatings.

    That is what leads to most of the brain damage, and that is what leads to most of the tragedy.
     
    Philosopher likes this.
  9. bbjc

    bbjc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,346
    5,257
    Feb 25, 2012
    The last death in bkb is at complete odds with all of that. Justin Thornton died back in 2021 after a bkb fight lasting 19 seconds.

    300 active bkb fighter and growing. 25000 active pro boxers. Them figures will flip if and when that sport grows.
     
  10. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,810
    29,594
    Jul 26, 2004
    Not really. Justin died due to injuries sustained from his fall. falling on his head from the ko injured his spine. not from brain trauma from the punch or from the direct nature of BKB fights.

    His injury could have happened just as easily in any combat sport and isnt represenative of BKB being uniquely dangerous.

    Again, he died of spinal complications because he landed wrong when he was kod.
    Thats not equivalent to having a boxer fall into a coma from prolonged punishment due directly to elements unique to boxing, or even equivalent to if a quick one punch ko causes a brain bleed.
    His was a freak accident.

    Your last statement is baseless conjecture just like everything else aimed at bkb in this thread.
     
    Philosopher likes this.
  11. GoodBot

    GoodBot You can like, just forget your password. Full Member

    3,228
    3,907
    Jan 25, 2026
    But the sport is older than BKFC. It was revived a while before them.

    Yes, in boxing you can take prolonged beatings, that much is certain. But bare knuckle is riddled with concussions, the evidence for that are all of the knockdowns.

    Not everything should be tolerated for the sake of "freedom". Its two men unnecessarily risking their health in a "sport" where they cant even defend themselves. Slap fighting, that is.
    They are effectively punching each other to see which one falls first.
     
  12. Kratos

    Kratos Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,978
    2,672
    Jan 27, 2014
    Boxing is much worse for the brain than bare knuckle and wrapped wrist bare knuckle, boxing gloves are horrible.