prime for prime Hearns vs Pryor

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by 80s champs, Nov 8, 2008.


  1. 80s champs

    80s champs Active Member Full Member

    536
    71
    Nov 9, 2005
    Yes we know they fought in the amatures with Pryor winning,but which was truly the more dominant later on? I say the Hit man,no contest! But don't count the Hawk out too soon.
     
  2. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,921
    77
    Oct 1, 2006
    At 147, its pretty close. I say Hearns takes a beating from an agressive Pryor, but manages a late KO.

    154 is a whole different story. That is where Hearns peaked and Aaron most likely couldn't carry the weight effectively. Therefore, it's Tommy in a one-sided beating here.
     
  3. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    It's not close at 147 either. Hearns would likely blow him out pretty early.
     
  4. pmfan

    pmfan Active Member Full Member

    1,408
    2
    May 11, 2008
    Pryor could hang with anyone at 140 all time, except maybe Duran (who skipped this weight all together). But at Welter Hearns was a terror, who would have a good chance to beat any other Welter that ever lived on any given night. Hearns by KO early at Welter.
     
  5. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,532
    9,538
    Jul 15, 2008
    In the amateurs Pryor was a twenty year old star and Hearns a 17 year ols kid and Tommy gave him hell .. the video is on youtube ... as a pro Hearns flattens him ...
     
  6. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,652
    13,053
    Apr 1, 2007
    Hearn's decapitates him somewhere in the middle rounds, I'd bet.

    Pryor was there to be hit and every other person he got into the ring with managed it, knocking him down fairly often.

    When Hearn's lands similar shots on a careless Pryor?

    Goodnight.
     
  7. The Wanderer

    The Wanderer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,815
    24
    Mar 28, 2008
    When Hearns hits Pryor with the same sort of open shots Arguello did, he takes Pryor's head off.
     
  8. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,652
    13,053
    Apr 1, 2007

    Exactly.
     
  9. birddog

    birddog Active Member Full Member

    1,012
    1
    Dec 1, 2005
    I agree also
     
  10. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Pryor was in his prime arguably at 135 (140 tops); Hearns was in prime at 154... thus it would hardly be a fair fight.
     
  11. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,744
    2,596
    Oct 18, 2004
    Aaron rushes in, and Tommy catches him with that long right, and it's over, one of them"count to 100 and still out" knockouts.
     
  12. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    83
    Jul 9, 2008
    Same exact thing I was thinking. I think Tommy would stop him, maybe straight up KO him, in 7 or 8 rounds.
     
  13. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    Pryor's defense is way too open for a rangey, fast, authoritive puncher like Hearns. His unorthodox style might well test Hearns' timing to the maximum. Pryor was a fluid mover around the ring, although very dis-jointed and somewhat unreadable. He might well have surprised a few people by lasting longer than expected against Hearns due to his movement and awkwardness. But Hearns catches him in the end.
     
  14. Rebel-INS

    Rebel-INS Mighty Healthy Full Member

    2,489
    4
    Apr 12, 2008
    Hearns in 4-6 rounds. Just far too big, fast and powerful for the much smaller Pryor. Amateurs doesn't matter one bit in the pro game.
     
  15. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,347
    9,969
    Jun 23, 2008
    The amatuers dont mean ****. Hearns woulda wasted Pryor at 147, and I'm a huge Pryor fan.