Tale of the tape - heavyweights

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by fists of fury, Aug 10, 2007.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,886
    53,071
    Feb 11, 2005
    Good comedy, my friend.

    A six foot Liston at 240 would be even more ponderous than the original version. Jeffries at 252 is just laughable. And the Bowling Ball you propose of Marciano is Saul Montana-esque.
     
  2. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,768
    2,348
    Aug 26, 2004

    Muscle weighs more than fat and look at 160 lb James Toney 238 at 5"9 too fat but he looked good at 200-210 (JIROV-HOLYFIELD fights) Problem with muscle is that it affects stamina, guys like Marciano,Jeffries,Foreman could gain weight if it was put on right and look better but it would affect there stamina
     
  3. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    To understand why the old timer fighters were lighter, one must understand the times they lived in. There was no such thing as air conditioning back then. Transportation was no walk in the park. Life’s most mundane tasks required men to break a sweat. Manual labor was at its peak. The fighters themselves could go beyond 15 rounds. Fat fighters do not do well in distance fights. There was no such thing as processed fast food loaded with fats, and such.

    Such conditions molded leaner and harder men built to go the distance.
    If fighters like Corbett, Fitzsimmons, Dempsey, Louis, and Marciano were fighting today, they would be at least 10-15 pounds heavier. Modern fighters diets in general are not as good. With the maximum distance being 12 rounds, fighters focus more on building muscles for hitting power, then cardio exercises designed to help fighter’s go 15 rounds.

    I do agree with poster Bummy Davis though. There is a thing as too much weight. How much is too much depends on the fighter’s height and body type.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,982
    27,972
    Feb 15, 2006
    While your argument is valid I think your estimates of how much muscle these guys could carry is a little optimistic. I would suggest the following are realistic (asuming they were totaly ripped)-

    Liston at 225 lbs
    Jeffries 230 lbs
    Dempsey 210 lbs
    Louis 220 lbs
    Marciano 205 lbs
    Baer 230 lbs
    Tunney 210 lbs

    Then again if you cut down the amout of roadwork they did to modern levels you could perhaps add 10 lbs to all of these figures albeit for no gain in performence.
     
  5. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,768
    2,348
    Aug 26, 2004
    Back then the good trainer established a good weight for the HEAVYWEIGHTS, even though it was not manditory, Joe Louis,Marciano,Dempsey etc. had to be cut, ripped and ready
     
  6. willjohn

    willjohn New Member Full Member

    10
    0
    May 27, 2011
    Boxers have bigger legs now because they lift weights, which was frowned on up until the 1960s because of the "musclebound" myth.
     
  7. RockysSplitNose

    RockysSplitNose Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,271
    63
    Jul 15, 2007
    I concur pretty much with what Bummy and Janitor have said so far in this thread - just thought i'd drop in two of the one's I always found funniest - that being Tyson's and Holy's heights - I have a friend who is bang on 6ft who met Tyson in Vegas 2 or 3 years back and he thought Tyson was about 3 or 4 inches shorter than him - he said he wasn't much taller than me (and I'm 5'8") - the photo he had with him confirmed that he was in the region of 3 to 4 inches shorter than him - 100% definately NOT the half inch shorter that his tale of the tape says

    also holyfield for all of his cruiserweight days was listed as 6ft 1in yet after being 'scientifically' trained he had not only put on 20 pounds of pure muscle but he had suddenly grown an extra inch too haha I remember one sarcastic writer commenting that he must've been put in a grow bag lol
     
  8. RockysSplitNose

    RockysSplitNose Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,271
    63
    Jul 15, 2007
    Yeah but Ali was wearing his nice thick soled shoes for that show in a vain attempt to not look quite as much of a short arse next to the human skyscraper
     
  9. steve w

    steve w Active Member Full Member

    815
    12
    Jun 5, 2011
    What height was Louis? A 220 Louis would destroy anyone that I have seen, I am guessing he was around 6ft 1.
     
  10. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    Vitali is 6'6" , McCline 6'3.5". McCline is actually shorter than Wladimir whom is visibly shorter than Vitali , and Wladimir was even listed 6'5" vs Puritty.
    Wladimir is 6'4.5" max.
    Regarding the picture above , McCline is probably on high heels .
     
  11. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    Toney is 5'8" , Roid 5'9" , Tyson 5'9"-5'9.5" , Tua 5'8-5'8.5"
    Marciano was in no way a millimeter above 5'10" , probably half an inch less or even shorter , photos do lie.
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,491
    30,301
    Jun 2, 2006
    Leadenly might be a more appropriate term
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,491
    30,301
    Jun 2, 2006
    Good Post!
    Jeffries often talked about how little a man of his bulk actually needed to keep in condition. I think he may have had the discipline of an early Marciano .
     
  14. Foreman Hook

    Foreman Hook ☆☆☆ G$ora ☆☆☆ Full Member

    8,234
    16
    Jul 30, 2010
    This content is protected
    .:deal
     
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,886
    53,071
    Feb 11, 2005