Who do you dislike more as a professional, Larry Merchant or Jim Gray? Concerning Merchant its a love hate thing. There are times when I don't care for him because he's very biased, but sometimes he tells the truth when it needs to be said. He asks questions that fans want to know during post fight interviews. Also he said "crunk" LOL, how can I totally be against him. You never know what you'll get with this guy. Jim Gray, I just can't stand the guy at all. Always bringing up the past to remind a fighter of past mistakes during interviews. As a person, I don't know him, but as a professional there is just something about him I don't particularly like. What are you thoughts on these two?
i hate gray... and like you said... sometimes i like larry, sometimes i hate him.. depends how he is. i do NOT like his interviews and wish they would get someone else to do them... it takes him a year to even think of the next question and he has a hard time spitting it out.
I don't think Merchant is biased at all. He tells it exactly how it is--no punches pulled. Jim Gray is a total annoying douche, probably a character designed by Showtime to be their version of Merchant. It's a total failure however.
Jim Gray, all the way. I quite like Merchant, drunken old rambler he is. Gray on the other hand is just a jerk.
Merchant is a living legend plain and simple. Sure he gets a bit pissed when two fighters aren't knocking chunks out of each other but let the poor old man have his drunken say, eh? Jim Gray is a fool,he manages to ask the most inappropriate questions and even when asks an appropriate one he puts it in a disrepesctful tone. *fighter gets knocked out* Gray: So how does it feel to get knocked out like that? atsch
agree 100%. and out of all sports, why is he working in boxing ?? he might be a good fit for figure skating ...seriously.
Gray needs to realize he's not some muckraking investigative reporter on Capitol Hill; he's in sports media (read: not very important in the scheme of things). He seems to have the misbegotten notion that his style of hardnosed journalism, by which he probably fancies himself gutsy and edgy, is only courageous in the right context. Interviewing boxers is not it. There's no demand for 'the hard questions' because nobody ****ing cares. Nobody expects athletes to be perfect orators, or even perfect people. We expect them to compete, nothing more. Interviews should consist of "What's your strategy?" "I'm going to knock his ass out!" "Ok thanks a lot". That's it. May as well not even conduct them, as far as I'm concerned. There's certainly no need to put a professional fighter trying to keep his mind on the task at hand before the fight, or absorbing his experience after a fight, under the hotlights with sustained hostile interrogation.