I must ask a few questions. Which champion do you think beats Choynski on his 7th recorded fight? I think most would lose. Many heavyweights have struggled with cruiserweight-sized fighters. Let us insert the following names commonly seen in the top ten. Jack Johnson, Jack Dempsey, Rocky Marciano, Joe Louis, Sonny Liston, and Muhammad Ali. In fact, some names I mentioned here lost to a currier weight sized fighter. My question is this.,Do the same standards of your ranking system apply to everyone, or just Jeffries? When Jeffries skills developed as champion, he did not need 15 rounds. The main reason why Shakrey lasted the distance was because Jeffries was injured, and fighting Shareky at his best.
Thing is, most of those names you mention also beat fighters of similar size, or bigger. Jeffries almost exclusively fought guys who were cruiserweights or smaller, while being a legitimate heavyweight himself. I understand that a man can only beat who is put in front of him, but those are the facts, and it's not like he simply bowled everyone over either. Corbett and Fitz in their second fights with him punished him badly before falling. He went through hell with Sharkey in their second fight as well. I just don't see a Lewis, Holmes, Tyson etc. having those problems with that competition.
Im forever changing but as it stands; Ali - First 3 time champ and his wins over Liston, Foreman, Frazier are 3 of the best scalps by a heavyweight. Jack Johnson - Iv gone from not thinking much of Johnson to think he is the best thing since sex with ya mates mum. he is the only pre Louis champ that should be in the top 10 as he is the the only guy to fought both the black and the white guys. He gets stick for not defending against the likes of Langford and Jeanette, but that had alot to do with the politics of the day and doesnt take away from the fact they he beat them before and they are on his record. add those guys to Burns, Flyn,Ketchel, Fitz, Old Jeffries and you have the 2nd greatest heavy of all time. Joe Louis - Techinically brilliant, longest title reign in the history of the division, he is certainly one of the greatest fighters ever in this weight class...but not THE greatest. :bart He lacks the star power on his CV to be at the top. Larry Holmes - Another heavy with a very long reign, did suffer because of his lack of star power in the division but that doesnt take away from his techinical ability and his dominance. George Foreman - Techincally not as strong as many other heavys I could name, but to come back after so long and win the linear title makes him great. He also demolished Smokin Joe, who I rate very highly. Lennox Lewis - Best heavyweight of recent times, 3 time title holder, cleaned out a division even though early on his was a very ducked man. People say his division wasnt good but thats because he was so dominant guys like Holyfield, Ruddock, Mercer, Bruno, Golota, Tyson, Tua, Rahman, Grant, Briggs and Klitschko are quality fighters. plus he avenged both losses in good style. H2H also one of the very best heavys. Rocky Marciano - Dominant heavyweight, being undefeated gives him extra kudos, but I think he stuggles the same way louis and Holmes struggles with the lack of star names on the record. I cant put him any higher than this. Also in H2H argument I think he comes up short. Joe Frazier - Probably has the best win from anyone on the list when beating Ali for the first time. Thats enough for him to be here. Evander Holyfield - 4 time titllist, beat Bowe and Tyson, held Lennox to a draw, was competiting in a very good heavyweight era even though being naturaly much smaller. Sonny Liston - H2H one of the most dangerous heavyweights ever. Noted more for his pre title fights rather than his championship fights, although demolishing Patterson isnt such a bad thing. Was unlucky that he ran into Clay, who is the GOAT. 11 - Mike Tyson, much like Liston was an animal to fight, but he didnt avenge losses and the fact that he is a wife beating, drug taking, cheatin, cannabalistic ****** does go against him. He didnt have a long reign nd didnt nothc up many good wins. But ovbiously a devastating talent. No way should Dempsey, Tunney or Jeffries be in the top 10.
01 - Muhammad Ali 02 - Joe Louis 03 - Sonny Liston 04 - Lennox Lewis 05 - Joe Frazier 06 - Jack Johnson 07 - Mike Tyson 08 - Larry Holmes 09 - Jim Jeffries 10 - Rocky Marciano 11 - Harry Wills 12 - George Foreman 13 - Jack Dempsey 14 - Evander Hollyfield 15 - Peter Jackson 16 - James J Corbett 17 - Max Schmeling 18 - Riddick Bowe 19 - Manny Pacquiao 20 - Wladimir Klitschko 22 - Jersey Joe Walcott 23 - Ezzard Charles 24 - Sam Langford 25 - Bob Fitzsimmons 26 - Gene Tunney
kilrain-slavin http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?_r=1&res=9902E0DB173AE533A25754C1A9609C94609ED7CF In fairness to JohnL, it's a lot easier to get a quick stoppage in a Queensburry fight. Also, observers at Sullivan-Kilrain felt that, after eight rounds, Sullivan would win if his stamina held. Pollack records at least one opinion that Sullivan was better than ever; but more opinions regarding Sullivan as not quite so good as earlier in the decade, but the best he'd been since then, and very suprising in his stamina.
Well, Lewis was take out twice by one punch, so yes, I think a cruiser weight sized fighter with a lot of power can upset him. It would be an upset, but it could happen. Tyson would likely roll many old timers, BUT Tyson was upset several times because he lacked heart and focus. I do not see Holmes losing to a cruiserweight sized fighter in his prime, but he did lose the first Spinks fight.
Slavin nealry killed Kirain. That was a brutal read. Had that fight been held in a modern era, its an early TKO. I get the hunch Slavin vs Sullivan would have been a ring classic. Sullvian would need all his stamina, because based on the limted stuff I have read between the two, Slavin was faster and more skilled with Queensburry rules. I have read Slavin vs Peter Jackson, and that was a war of a match too.
1. Muhammad Ali 2. Joe Louis 3. Rocky Marciano 4. Mike Tyson 5. Lennox Lewis 6. Larry Holmes 7. Sonny Liston 8. Jack Johnson 9. George Foreman 10. Joe Frazier 11. Harry Wills 12. Jack Dempsey 13. Evander Holyfield 14. Jim Jeffries After this, it gets very murky imo.
Comparing my list with yours, it appears we have 23 of the same top 26, with the only discrepancies in inclusion being that I have Patterson, Johansson and Norton instead of your choices of Sullivan, Corbett and Jackson- something of a generation preference thing there, I suppose. Right now, with a lot of easily-interchangeable positions, and noting that I'm not including guys who are still active and "live" and/or have a large number of active-and-"live" major opponents (guys like the Klitschkos and Tua should make this list when all is said and done), I have it: 1. Ali 2. Louis 3. Foreman 4. Marciano 5. Frazier 6. Holmes 7. Dempsey 8. Jeffries 9. Johnson 10. Holyfield 11. Liston 12. Tyson 13. Lewis 14. Walcott 15. Charles 16. Patterson 17. Bowe 18. Tunney 19. Schmeling 20. Langford 21. Johansson 22. Norton 23. Wills 24. Max Baer 25. Fitzsimmons 26. Jack Sharkey 27. Elmer Ray 28. Archie Moore 29. Jerry Quarry 30. Jim Corbett 31. Tim Witherspoon 32. Mike Spinks 33. Tom Sharkey 34. Joe Jeanette 35. Jimmy Young 36. Sam McVey 37. Jimmy Bivins 38. Jimmy Ellis 39. Peter Jackson 40. Ike Ibeabuchi 41. Billy Conn 42. Harold Johnson 43. Jim Braddock 44. Jess Willard 45. Primo Carnera 46. Eddie Machen 47. Roland LaStarza 48. Billy Miske 49. Buster Douglas 50. Michael Moorer Within the top 26, I am tempted to switch Foreman with Marciano, Dempsey with Jeffries, Holyfield with Liston, Tyson with Lewis, and Patterson with Bowe, and to push Harry Wills up a little. All-in-all, we are on a pretty similar wavelength, then. That said, I feel that you have Tunney too high, Foreman considerably too low, and that at least Patterson deserves a spot in the top 26. The Sullivan ranking is obviously much different from mine, as I don't tend to consider him a candidate for ranking among gloved champions, but if I were to do so, certainly his accomplishments were impressive enough to merit a high standing.