how good is Carl Froch?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jinx, Dec 9, 2008.


  1. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    His strengths are he seems very strong, his chin is very solid, he has a strong mentality in the ring, he punches quite hard, he has a good jab.

    Weaknesses are he's extremely slow, both on his feet and with his hands. Many of his power punches are telegraphed. His hands are low, and he doesn't have either the reflexes or speed to avoid being hit. He also has lazy inactive periods.

    Overall, he's pretty good. He's a threat to people with a questionable chin or defence. If you are quicker than him (everybody), have better skills (most) and a solid chin you shouldn't have a problem.
     
  2. Cruiser1

    Cruiser1 Champion Emeritus Full Member

    4,622
    2
    Feb 23, 2005
    Andrade appears to be the litmus test for the 168 lb. division. Kessler handled him quite easily and Bute barely made it to the finish line against him. Stieglitz is a decent fighter but couldn't withstand Andrade's assault. Froch would be better off fighting someone else cuz a fight with Andrade would probably shave a few years off his career whether he wins or loses.
     
  3. sean

    sean pale peice of pig`s ear Full Member

    10,097
    1,094
    Jul 19, 2004
    IMO he will not have a long title reign
    to many funadamental flaws.

    exciting fighter to watch, but not that adaptable and vunerable to a lot of styles.
     
  4. Cruiser1

    Cruiser1 Champion Emeritus Full Member

    4,622
    2
    Feb 23, 2005
    Damn, we must have posted at the exact same moment because our posts are near identical except for the ending.
     
  5. RonnieHornschuh

    RonnieHornschuh ESB indie police Full Member

    6,024
    17
    Mar 21, 2007
    no, he couldn't beat kessler. froch - andrade would be a competitive fight.
     
  6. Tom_Tocca

    Tom_Tocca The Provider Full Member

    5,982
    0
    Dec 10, 2005
    Abraham beats him due to speed advantage (wow, never thought I would say that AA wins a fight due to that fact)...
     
  7. David UK

    David UK Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    Feb 6, 2007
    Froch would anililate Mundine(who was KO'd by Ottke remember!!), he'd beat Bute easily,Taylor would be harder but Froch still a clear winner,50/50 fight with Kessler,lose to Calzaghe.

    Taylor should fight the much avoided Pascal.
     
  8. laffie

    laffie Montreal Full Member

    12,846
    1
    Jan 5, 2008
    So, Froch had to give everything he had against Jean Pascal, who is far to be at the same level as Bute, but would win EASILY against Bute. Listen mate, at that level, Froch won't have a single easy fight. That just proves you're a nuthugger. Try to analyze a little bit instead being a cheerleader.
     
  9. THN

    THN Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,386
    0
    Apr 8, 2007
    Not to good!
     
  10. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    Any heavy handed fighter with decent fundamentals will tear Froch apart, including MIDDLEWEIGHTS Abraham and Pavlik. If the fight happened right away, I can see Froch battering AA around the ring a bit, but AA would catch him periodically, and I don't think you can get "caught" by Arthur more than 2 or 3 times and not get put to sleep. Right now Pavlik/froch would be very similar to Pavlik/Miranda. If Arthur or Kelly moved to 168 the right way, and then fought Froch, Carl would not see round 6.
     
  11. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    :lol::lol::lol:
    :patsch
     
  12. JIM KELLY

    JIM KELLY Bullshyt Mr Han Man! Full Member

    21,349
    1
    Sep 14, 2008
    Kessler would make mince meat out of the Froch who fought pascal. Apparently Froch had injured ribs and a sore ear drum. So he was basically damaged goods and still held his own.

    Froch needs to tighten up and use the jab from the get-go!

    As for Taylor, that would be a 50/50 in my books.