P - o - u - n - d - f - o - r - p - o - u - n - d - t - o - p - 1 - 0 - 0

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Dec 12, 2008.

Page 2 of 17
  1. Beatboxer

    Beatboxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    2,937
    Likes Received:
    2
    Nice effort!

    I might get round to doing one myself one day....

    Until then, my input lacks any real legitimacy so I won't bother giving any other than to say 'fine effort'.
     
    Beatboxer, Dec 12, 2008
    #16
  2. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    51,687
    Likes Received:
    23
    yeah, i know youre an expert on sam langford.....and all ten minutes of footage that exist...to make him #2 all time EVER. hahaha
     
    iceman71, Dec 12, 2008
    #17
  3. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Messages:
    3,589
    Likes Received:
    1
    I guess I just can't believe Dempsey, The Manssa Mauler, is so low.

    Nice job overall pal.
     
    King Dan, Dec 12, 2008
    #18
  4. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Don't be silly, any comments and criticisms appreciated I said. Have I made any horrible errors or great calls here??
     
    DINAMITA, Dec 12, 2008
    #19
  5. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Messages:
    3,589
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joe Louis too low, Roy Jones too high, but I know you think Roy in the mid nineties is one of the best head to head guys ever.
     
    King Dan, Dec 12, 2008
    #20
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    113,046
    Likes Received:
    48,173
    Just a side note really, but I see these guys as tiered off, too, seperate. Our top five is the same if you switch Langford and Sugar.

    No bother, glad to be off help. Glad to see Williams made the cut even if Dixon didn't.

    No serious objections, I think it's a good list. People generally object to 100's less because they naturally get softer after about 45-55. If you get those boys right (Which you pretty much have) nobody will complain.

    Jack Dempsey and George Foreman do not belong in a 100 IMO. Foreman can almost be justified based upon the comeback, but Dempsey? Borderline top 200 IMO. Let's hear why you have him in there.

    Glad you found a spot for Calzaghe, shows your lack of bias.
     
    McGrain, Dec 12, 2008
    #21
  7. kgs83

    kgs83 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2008
    Messages:
    1,868
    Likes Received:
    0
    I could ever do a top 100 as i've not even heard of some of the boxers on the list let alone seen them box. Also half the ones i have heard of i haven't seen them box.

    When did you get time to see videos of all these fighters fight? Or have you seen half them fight? Not digging you or anything, just curious.

    Anyhows good effort.
     
    kgs83, Dec 12, 2008
    #22
  8. LHL

    LHL Captain Freedom Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2008
    Messages:
    23,826
    Likes Received:
    3
    I didnt see billy dib in top 1 so you either havnt seen his great displays or your drunk when you done this... was no point nice waste of time... On a more serious note well done :good
     
    LHL, Dec 12, 2008
    #23
  9. Beatboxer

    Beatboxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    2,937
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ahhhh I swear I'll get back to you one day, I feel any comments I make would have more legitimacy if I went and made a top 100 fighter list myself and went through all the reasons why x placed here and y placed there.
     
    Beatboxer, Dec 12, 2008
    #24
  10. VARG

    VARG Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    8,005
    Likes Received:
    0

    Actually yea...why the **** is DLH above Tito in tiers...I find this to be blasphemy...

    DLH followed far too many of Trinidad's previous opponents and lost a majority of his big time fights...I understand he is one of the most popular fighters ever but that puts in the HOF not top 100...im not saying he shouldn't be in there but cmon man...not above Tito :bart

    And how in the world is JCC so low as well as far as Tiers go...I think he should EASILY be in the top level minimally second tier as well
     
    VARG, Dec 12, 2008
    #25
  11. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    26,774
    Likes Received:
    8

    hey great list buddy. theonly thing that I would do is have Mayweather in front of Whitaker, also I think Cotto is not a top 60 yet but could get there at only 27.
     
    buckdacious, Dec 12, 2008
    #26
  12. VARG

    VARG Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    8,005
    Likes Received:
    0

    I made the same mistake...that's Miguel CANTO! But at first glance it looks like Cotto
     
    VARG, Dec 12, 2008
    #27
  13. Boxing Gloves

    Boxing Gloves Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    3,520
    Likes Received:
    1,593
    great list, must have took you ages, might be a few too many heavyweights on the list, but other than that, top notch.
     
    Boxing Gloves, Dec 12, 2008
    #28
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    113,046
    Likes Received:
    48,173

    I think there is more than ten minutes on YouTube, never mind in exsistance.

    But you're right, he's the clear #1:yep
     
    McGrain, Dec 12, 2008
    #29
  15. kel

    kel Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Messages:
    5,897
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not only what u said but Sugar Shane misses out altogether and he beat DLH twice.
     
    kel, Dec 12, 2008
    #30
Page 2 of 17