Funny how all three judges disagree with you. I think you'll find you are the one wearing the "Calslappy" goggles. There is a range of scores that impartial judges can get for that fight ranging from Hopkins winning by a point to Joe winning 116-11. Pretty much anything outside taht range marks you down as a nutter, a hater or a hugger. Which one are you? Oh, and lets see you card so we can all have a laugh.
it was a horrible fight, doesn't matter who trow more punches, who ever landed more should win... in that case Hopkins won.
I had Calzaghe winning both times I scored it by a clear margin, but honestly, it was as bad as I've seen either guy look. Funny how that works considering both were among the best fighters the other's faced.
If I thought you actually believed any of that shyte, I'd conclude that you knew sweet **** all about boxing. But your position on Calzaghe has been long known, and so your 'opinion' here is understandable.
'Fighting Weight' should be banned from here. For his own sake - he should be on medication some where - healing.
You have to completely ignore anything he posts about Joe, or either Klit. Other than that, he's not a bad poster. Usually quite good with his phrasology, especially the retort.
Cazlaghe 11 - 1 Hopkins. + 1 point for a KD to Bernard. That's it. Punch count numbers support this. Joe landed more punches in every single round than did Bernard. Rarely has there been more clear punchcount numbers.
From his tasteless ''I'll never let a white boy beat me'' comments to his shameful and cowardly faking of low blows in the 10th and 11th rounds..................Hopkins showed his true colours in that fight. Put it this way..................would you trust him with your money or your life (or your Mrs)?
Its only against lesser fighters that you can display your full talents. Its a testament to their superb ability that they made each other look so ****ing awful.