Fights where two eras clashed

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, Dec 14, 2008.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,597
    27,270
    Feb 15, 2006
    We spend a lot of time on this site speculating about the outcome of fights between fighters from diferent eras and we dont always agree on the respective strengths of diferent eras.

    Ocasionaly however you get a situation where figfhters from two diferent eras do square off. This thread is to talk about them and what they might tell us.

    Jem Mace
    Mace continued to fight up to the age of 60 and was quite happy to mix it up with world class fighters at this age. He fought Charlie Mitchel at the age of 58 and aged 60 he fought a NC bout with Tommy Ryan.

    Harold Johnson
    Fought many of the same oponents as the fighters of the 70s and aquited himself well.

    Floyd Patterson
    Fought many top fighters of the 70s and only lost convincingly to the best.

    Larry Holmes
    Mixed it up at the top level in the 90s.
     
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,178
    25,426
    Jan 3, 2007
    Holyfield vs Foreman.

    I don't know what this fight told us, given that Foreman was a different man when he fought Evander. The cross arm defensive style that he brought to his new game, was non-existant in the 1970's, as was his tactic of pacing himself early and picking shots rather than just hurling them in volume. My question would be, if a young Foreman had polished up his game in similar fashion to the way he did 15 years later, could he have beaten Holyfield or perhaps even Ali? My answer is maybe. I'm not so sure that an unpolished Foreman of 1973 would have beaten a 1991 Holyfield, by virtue of the fact that he could not outpoint him over 12 or 15 rounds, and nor do I see anyone stopping a peak Holy inside of 5 rounds.
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,597
    27,270
    Feb 15, 2006
    More telling for my money was Holmes Mercer.

    You have to think that if Holmes could beat Mercer at that age he would have had to be one of the absolute elite of that era at his peak. It rather calls into question the asertion that his own era was weaker.
     
  4. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,178
    25,426
    Jan 3, 2007

    Agreed,

    I think Holmes at his best would have beaten all of the top raters who were around in 1992. I see him outpointing Evander, Ruddock, and several others. Lewis and Bowe would have been tough fights, but I'm inclined to giving Larry the edge. He could not however, show up like he did in the Witherspoon fight against some of these men though.
     
  5. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Well anyone who doubt that Holmes would be anything less than the elite of his era would be deluded in the first place.



    By the way, what about Holmes vs McCall and Holyfield? You can't look at the positives and ignore the negatives.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,597
    27,270
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  7. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,425
    Aug 22, 2004
    ...............Fenech-Zarate is a decent pick, I think, though few gave Zarate a realistic chance.


    Olivares-Jose Luis Ramirez is interesting, especially because Olivares, who by that time was fighting strictly from memory, starched young Ramirez in 2.
     
  8. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Perhaps, but an equally important question here is: would Holmes have been as willing as Lewis to prove himself, given that he willfully avoided 8 big fights during his own era?


    So the negatives at his age don't count, but the positives do? Hardly fair is it?
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,597
    27,270
    Feb 15, 2006
    Well what exactly is a negative?

    If these guys were of the same calibre as Holmes they should have destroyed him at this stage.

    When Louis, Marciano, Ali and Holmes were put in with ageing former greats they didnt edge them they destroyed them.
     
  10. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    No they didn't. Marciano needed 13 rounds to KO Walcott when slightly behind on points (according to your reasoning, Walcott would've destroyed Marciano if he was younger) and Joe Louis was in fact knocked out by the former champion in Schmeling (though he did destroy Carnera and Sharkey).

    Holyfield-Holmes and Holyfield-Foreman weren't competitive. Great efforts for their age, but neither looked like they were winning at any point in the fights.
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,597
    27,270
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  12. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,628
    713
    May 22, 2007
    Archie Moore vs Ali
    Giardello vs Ray Robinson
     
  13. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,425
    Aug 22, 2004
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,597
    27,270
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  15. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,425
    Aug 22, 2004