Today proved that Wladimir Klitschko is a fraud

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Uppercut83, Dec 15, 2008.


  1. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Wlad is an All Time Great boxer whether you approve or not.

    Wlad would be a tough fight for any HW in history whether you like it or not.

    So would Vitali, any HW in history. Fact.

    It hurts doesn't it? 'Sucks to see that you don't know **** about a sport you profess to love. All these years that you've been bashing the KLits and all for nothing. It suck to be you. :thumbsup:-(
     
  2. See Me Flow

    See Me Flow The Pharaoh of Boxing Full Member

    6,482
    2
    Jul 20, 2004

    Don't even get me started on this "Americans have done for Iraq" bull****. Americans have done nothing for Iraq other than destroy and kill more people than Saddam could ever dream.

    I don't want to kiss your stank ass. But I would love to crack open your ****ing skull if I ever got the opportunity.
     
  3. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    That was a last minute fillin since Povetkin, the guy who won the IBF tourney, was injured.

    Don't play like Wlad chose him the way Valuev chose Holyfield.
     
  4. In_FlaMeS

    In_FlaMeS K-BKois Full Member

    954
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    One of the best post I've ever read on this board... 100 % AGREED :thumbsup
     
  5. eltorrente

    eltorrente Active Member Full Member

    1,231
    1
    May 18, 2006
    Based on what?!?!

    Beating Byrd or the Boxing Banker?!?! Those are his biggest wins I think.. or maybe Brewster? I'm not sure who he's beaten to give you that impression.
     
  6. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004

    I'd butt **** you like your daddy did.
     
  7. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    I know, I would have complimented him too but I was too busy teaching this douche bag about the sweet science.
     
  8. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Apparently Byrd beat some decent fighters to be ranked #1 by the Ring Magazine no? He did have a string of victories and Wlad pummeled him twice, even better the second time.
     
  9. See Me Flow

    See Me Flow The Pharaoh of Boxing Full Member

    6,482
    2
    Jul 20, 2004
    Only a ****** like you would say such a thing. Not surprised since you're a Klitschko cocksucker.
     
  10. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    89
    Jul 19, 2004
    Wladimir Klitschko
    Vitali Klitschko
    Nikolay Valuev
    Ruslan Chagaev
    David Haye
    Sam Peter
    Sultan Ibragimov
    Calvin Brock
    Alexander Povetkin
    Chris Arreola
    Hasim Rahman
    Juan Carlos Gomez
    Eddie Chambers
    Lamon Brewster
    John Ruiz
    Alexander Dimitrenko
    Jameel McCline


    ect.....

    I really don't see how people pretend like this isn't a good division. Once again, it's an obvious case of mistaking name recognition for talent. Just because most of these guys are up and coming... and most of them aren't from the US, doesn't mean that they aren't talented boxers. Back in the 90's everyone used to say that it was the weakest division ever... now people act like it was a great decade. Look at the 80's... Even the 70's. Everyone says that was the best era... why? Ali was considered the greatest... because he said that he was. So... Smokin' Joe beat him... so he must be great too... Foreman beat Joe... so he must be great too... see how that works? All of that is based off of the theory that Ali was the greatest. We really have no idea, as we only know how they fought against each other. We have no idea how those guys would fair in this era. Obviously... they would be too small.... but you get the point. Ali was considered the greatest, yet he got beat by Norton, who clearly wasn't an ATG if you follow the sport. Now, if you really look at all three fights, many people believe that Norton beat him all three times.

    It is easy to be a critic. The reality of the situation is that there is NEVER a time when there aren't good heavyweight fighters in the entire world. We are talking about the ENTIRE WORLD! There are simply times when people have yet to build their legacies, and we aren't sure where everyone will end up at the end of their careers. Era's ALWAYS look better when you can look back on them after all of the fighters in that era have retired, and have a body of work to look at.
     
  11. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    You can throw all the shoes you want as long as we don't throw Iraq any more money. How's that sound?
     
  12. Suge Green

    Suge Green Boxing Junkie banned

    7,678
    3
    Sep 15, 2006

    I believe the appropriate term is KLIT-ite...:deal
     
  13. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Nothing sexual about it.
     
  14. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Oh please, as if you have any legit credentials around here. You're a one trick poney, bash the Klitschkos opponents before they even fight them so you can say they're frauds. Been there, done that.

    Amazing that Sam Peter's only losses came from the Klitschkos.
     
  15. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Some people are unhappy that the 2 best HWs in the world aren't American or "thug gansta wannabes" like Haye, Arreola, etc.

    I'm 42 years old and my son looks up to the Klitschkos, Lewis, Holyfield, Marciano, Ali & any other dominant fighter during their era.

    He's 7 years old & he has more sense than half the idiots who post here.