If Calzaghe did the right thing.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Infern0, Dec 18, 2008.


  1. Infern0

    Infern0 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,854
    0
    Oct 9, 2008
    Rematched Hopkins, then fought the winner of Dawson V Tarver would he lose his ud record?
     
  2. sean

    sean pale peice of pig`s ear Full Member

    10,097
    1,093
    Jul 19, 2004
    IMO both fights would take place in his hometown, and with the crowd backing and his hands going like windmills for 12 rounds, it is hard to beat calzaghe on points in his backyard.
     
  3. finalfight

    finalfight Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,706
    1
    Dec 5, 2008
    Yes but probably not to Tarver (in the miracle event of Tarver getting past Dawson).

    I believe both Hopkins and Dawson have what it takes to beat Joe Calzaghe.
     
  4. theboy_racer

    theboy_racer Boxing Junkie banned

    8,843
    4
    Mar 4, 2006
  5. BobDigi5060

    BobDigi5060 East Side MMA Full Member

    10,898
    2
    Feb 7, 2006
    It's possible I think Dawson has a better shot than Hopkins. Can't really see Hopkins doing any better.
     
  6. BadJuju83

    BadJuju83 Bolivian Full Member

    3,941
    2
    Sep 19, 2008
    No.

    Better question would be, Why is it the right thing?

    or

    What about the right thing by Johnson?. Maybe he should get both Calzaghe and Dawson in the ring in 09, if your so concerned about the right thing being done.
     
  7. Shaolin Box

    Shaolin Box Respect Full Member

    4,030
    3
    Nov 30, 2007
    "The Calzahe's dont do rematches" :lol:

    So I guess we'll never see Hopkins beat JC.

    As for Dawson? JC wont fight him either.:huh

    Maybe JC is will challenge Hearn's to put another ATG on his resume...:-(
     
  8. finalfight

    finalfight Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,706
    1
    Dec 5, 2008
    Hopkins' conditioning seems better at the moment though as evidenced during the Pavlik fight. I don't think he would slow down or resort to holding in the event of a rematch. I also think that Calzaghe wants nothing to do with Hopkins again, probably because he considers him dangerous.

    Just another name to add to Joe's 'must avoid' list.
     
  9. Shaolin Box

    Shaolin Box Respect Full Member

    4,030
    3
    Nov 30, 2007
    Exactly... Forgot about that. How many times has Joe ducked Johnson now?
     
  10. Calzaghe isn't going to rematch Hops what for??:roll:been there done that he already beat him..
    Calzaghe has said he might retire he has nothing left to prove 46-0:deal
     
  11. Shaolin Box

    Shaolin Box Respect Full Member

    4,030
    3
    Nov 30, 2007
    A very close SD, thats why he should rematch him.

    Nothing else to prove? What has he proved exactly? Other than beating past their prime oldies.

    There are plenty of good fights out there for him.
     
  12. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    88
    Jul 19, 2004
    Beating Hopkins twice does absolutely nothing for Calzaghe.
     
  13. toffeejack

    toffeejack Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,064
    1
    Apr 30, 2007
    The 'right thing' would be for Joe to retire, he has nothing else to prove expect to the haters and **** them all anyway.
     
  14. BobDigi5060

    BobDigi5060 East Side MMA Full Member

    10,898
    2
    Feb 7, 2006
    I think it may be Joe's style. Like in the Taylor rematch he won't be able to win enough rounds in order to win the fight but who knows.
     
  15. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    81
    Sep 3, 2007
    No he doesnt, he has 1 L in his name tho.:bbb

    My guess is that if Joe did fight those 2 guys, he would retire at 48-0 rather than 46-0 then he would be ducking Johnson or Taylor or some other ****.