Today proved that Wladimir Klitschko is a fraud

What part of "even if Rahman was not a strong opponent" did you have trouble understanding?

 

Yeah but Rahman was a replacement, that´s the only reason Wlad fought him. You´d have had to wait longer between fights if Wlad had not fought Rahman and waited for Povetkin to recover.

 

Great avatar!

 

Nothing wrong with my reading comprehension, it's you that doesn't seem to be getting the picture here. I already said that VITLAY was going for Haye well before the WALDO fight, he'd appeared on TV over here and put himself forward and Haye has said something along the lines of "if I can't fight WALDO I'll fight VITLAY instead then" which is why Haye is now drumming up interest in the VITLAY fight. What WALDO said in the post fight interview has nothing to do with who Haye is now fighting, it had already been decided before he made those comments. I suspect VITLAY stepped in thinking that Haye would back down from him but he obviously hasn't. I get the feeling Haye is being too brave for his own good but being the kind of guy he is and always has been, I hope he wins and sets up a match with WALD.

If you read the part of your post I've quoted you might see for yourself just what a contradiction it is - suggesting Haye has changed his mind and WALDO is the big brave man for calling him out (when he knew a contract was on the table for Haye V VITLAY) and then with your final sentence saying that a fight with WALD was never on the table anyway

Shame really, cos the part of your post I didn't quote made a lot more sense.

 

The Champion of a division CANNOT be accused of "ducking" a fighter with no significant wins in the division. Haye's only win that means anything at all at heavyweight is a victory over a guy Wlad destroyed years ago.

 

So where's the quote of the week at...???

 

Perfectly stated. nothing more needs to be said.

Either beat a hw with a heartbeat, earn a mandatory shot, or STFU :hi:

 

Ruskull I totally disagree with your opinion that the US has done so much for Iraq. Aside from invading the country twice, they put sanctions on Iraq that probably hurt the Iraqi people more than the two wars combined. IMO the money they are "throwing into Iraq" does not go to help the Iraqi nation so much as to help the US establish their hold on the assets they want to control in Iraq and into US corporations that work in Iraq.

I still have no need to call you a homosexual or throw any other sexually based insults at you. Some of you guys should really grow up.

 

You wonder what he'll do when Haye kicks the **** out his big brother.
He'll probably have to go back to pretending he doesn't know who Haye is.:-(

 

Today proved that Uppercut83 is an idiot

Every day he posts proves the same thing !

 

That's a good pernt ( point ):hi:

 

Absolute bollocks.

It's been said many times before that unified champs of lower divisions often jump up and challenge the champ at the higher weight, this has happened for years.

I could list examples but I just can't be bothered to try to educate a known Klit-ite who is trying to make excuses for WALDO and his ***** moves.

 

Not exactly true, Sanders said that Wlad wanted a rematch, but that Wlad didn't want the rematch straightaway. He also claimed the WBO was monkeying around to keep him(Sanders) from fighting anyone dangerous until Wlad decided he was ready for the rematch. Sanders didn't want to wait around for Wlad or put up with the WBO's gamesplaying, and that's why he gave up the title and sought a big fight elsewhere.

 

:yep...and that's what I'm talking about.

...***** moves.

Remember when WLAD didn't have his brother with him, and "The Hayemaker" got up in his face...???

Well when ViTKLiT has his back, he's saying "Where is David Haye, Why isn't he so loud..."

ViTKLiT already went to England to run interference though. :deal

After team KLIT had said Haye is next for WLAD...:-(

ViTKLiT shows up to Haye's fight and pulls the famous, "KLiT FLiP"
:bart

 

Did you pick the wrong thread? When exactly did I call you a homo?

I'll answer anyway...........

Iraq invaded Kuwait,which we had to protect. After we won the first Gulf War we had to enforce no fly zones in the north & south of Iraq to protect the Kurds & the Shiites from Saddam's army. Iraq fired on our planes & refused to capitulate, even though he lost the war. He boasted that he had weapons of mass destruction and twarted attempts by UN inspectors to check on certain sites. He wanted us & his people to believe he had something to hide. His was given every opportunity to allow the inspectors to do their jobs yet he wouldn't, and so he paid the price.

Before you claim that we asked so much of Saddam keep in mind what the allies demanded of Germany after WWI & easpecially after WWII.

As far as the sanctions are concerned we & the UN went to extremes to provide for the Iraqi people by allowing them to sell oil for food............I could go on but if you don't agree with these simple parts how could you ever figure out the rest?