Harder Puncher- Sam Langford or Bob Fitzsimmons?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Quickhands21, Dec 20, 2008.

  1. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    43,969
    Likes Received:
    13,339
    I'd like to believe that Langford beat hit this hard, but I remain at least skeptical in a logical sense.

    All of Fitz and Joe Choynski's common opponents said that Joe clearly hit harder then Fitz.

    And, following that train of thought, Langford sure as hell didn't spark out Jack Johnson like Choynski managed to, and this is when Langford weighed in as a middleweight against Johnson. So how can Langford rank higher then Choynski in a P4P sense?
     
  2. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    13,041
    Likes Received:
    2,512
    Dunkhorst's weight was only author's estimation. NY Sun, for example, said he "weighed at least 225 pounds." He was described as very fat, and was considered "fourth class boxer", never having won any important fight. Also not quite a one-punch KO, IMHO, as Fitz was beating him mercilessly, until he was ready to drop on his own, from exhaustion, when Bob landed that left hook.
     
  3. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    Messages:
    5,641
    Likes Received:
    735
    In terms of pure power maybe Langford just but Fitz seemed to be more economical with his shots. Interesting that Russell mentioned Choynski who Jeffries and Johnson said hit them hardest Corbett might have as well can't remember. Regardless all of these men had amazing power and more so how they were able to carry their power up in weight, as all were punchers from middleweight (even lower for Sam) to heavyweight.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,982
    Likes Received:
    27,974
    If you are arguing that Langford is more proven against world class fighters over 200 lbs then I wont contradict you.

    I have heard reports of Dunkhorsts weight ranging from 220-300 lbs for differnt fights so it is hard to know exactly what his real weight was or what his condition was like for a given fight. What I do know is that a lot of people thought that the size diference would be too much for Fitz to overcome and were shocked by the ease with which he disposed of Dunkhorst.
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,982
    Likes Received:
    27,974
    The reaction after the fight.

    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,982
    Likes Received:
    27,974
    This content is protected
    The predictions before the fight.

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,982
    Likes Received:
    27,974
    The machinations before the fight.

    This content is protected
     
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,982
    Likes Received:
    27,974
    When Hague found out how big Sam Langford was he laughed and said that he wouldnt bother to train because no 5' 6'' 170 lb fighter could beat him.

    Boy did he make a mistake.
     
  9. Big N Bad

    Big N Bad Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2007
    Messages:
    1,990
    Likes Received:
    12
    lol didnt know that
     
  10. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    43,969
    Likes Received:
    13,339
    Any thoughts on the Choynski observation, Janitor?
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,982
    Likes Received:
    27,974
    Common oponents of Choynski and Fitzsimmons all seem to name Choynski as the hardest hitter they ever faced while Fitzsimmons seems to have been more durable and the better finisher. I do thionk that comparisons between Choynski and the aforementioned gentlemen are valid.

    More on him later.
     
  12. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Messages:
    43,969
    Likes Received:
    13,339
    Waiting with bated breath on it, then. :)
     
  13. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2004
    Messages:
    2,359
    Likes Received:
    311
    It's not easy to be sure. More evidence for Langford vs 210+ Ib good fighters; but maybe that's cause Fitzsimmons big-guy opponent was Jeffries. Could Langford have stopped Jeffries? Sam's manager, at least, publicly disavowed any interest in machting against Jeffries.
     
  14. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    8,850
    Likes Received:
    246
    Not bumped by Thinblack. Also interesting debate.
     
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    65,897
    Likes Received:
    53,095

    ...if Chuvalo had fought a bunch of middles and light heavies as his best competition.

    I have installed the "Dunkhorst chip" into my computer which deletes any mention of his name. I assume he has been brought up in this thread.