I'd say Peter wins by KO in the first 4 rounds in a very entertaining fight. It won't exactly be one for the boxing purists though...............:yep Peter has the proven chin, proven experience & proven power. Arreola's a bit of a question mark in all areas.
I'd take Peter by KO.He is still basically the same age as Arreola and has been in ther ewith much better opposition.
It would be 2 dreadfully skilless, fat heavyweights swinging away at each other with everything they got. Either guy could win this by KO at any point.
Peter and here's why: The way to beat Peter is to use height and reach, as the Klits prove, to keep distance and pick him apart. Even McCline gave Peter trouble with his height. If you don't have the jab and the ability to box a bit, Peter uses his physical strength and power to roll you. Look at the guys that have made it the distance with Peter: Shufford, Pudar, Hawkins, Toney--guys who either are pretty cautious boxers or in the older Toney's case, one of the craftiest fighters with a granite chin. Arreola at six three would have a three inch height advantage, but he doesn't use his height and jab to keep the gap, his jab is there almost always in a forward-moving way. He would be right there for Peter. I like Arreola, yet I don't think he's strong enough at this stage to outmuscle Peter and it's unlikely that in a test of knockout power he's going to come out with the upper hand and get a ko. Peter has the advantages in this fight. I'm not sold his losses have affected him that much, just really bad style equations. I'd go with Peter to stop Arreola inside of seven rounds.
Peter needs to come in around 243 lbs. He will TKO Arreola in the 1st round. Arreola stops too many shots with his face.