Who is The Greatest Asian Fighter of All time???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PacDbest, Jun 22, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,148
    18,528
    Jul 29, 2004
    Yet again dodging my responses and changing the subject...Ill ask again HAVE YOU SEEN HARADA vs KINGPETCH II?
     
  2. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Dec 4, 2008
    nope.i am too young. but articles are all over. now, ask the pseudoexperts here if they have seen it. doubtful . LOL:lol:
     
  3. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,148
    18,528
    Jul 29, 2004
    How old are you?
     
  4. bulakenyo

    bulakenyo Am I a boxing fan yet? Full Member

    8,356
    20
    Jun 2, 2006
    :lol:

    Eh, what the heck.. I'll just watch you guys.

    :pop
     
  5. Nestea

    Nestea Thirst Remover Full Member

    7,336
    0
    Feb 25, 2008
    Koki Kameda Ko1 Pacquiao/Harada on a handicap 2-1 bout
     
  6. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Dec 4, 2008

    irrelevant cross examination question.

    get back at me if you have proof.
     
  7. Shogun_12

    Shogun_12 Member Full Member

    210
    0
    Dec 23, 2008
    why does everybody discredit pac? everyone makes excuses for his wins.. give the guy some slack. of course he's the greatest asian boxer ever! pacman sells ppvs, harada? pacman has a better record, harada? pacman fights in mainstream fights, harada? plus he is one of the remaining draws in boxing today. i may not be making any point (cause im busy at work) but i think pacman is head and shoulders above harada in accomplishments and skill. the 2 shouldnt even be compared.
     
  8. HyperBone

    HyperBone Silverback Gorilla Full Member

    7,152
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    harada was great (just look at harada jofre in youtube and you'll judge how special he was as a fighter, and he has also proven that he can go out of his turf if needed... hell, he once fought in the usa and fought famechon, another great fighter, in his home turf). pac is great too (no need to mention his achievements)

    get over it already. people are entitled to their own opinion.
     
  9. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    If you were around in Kingpetch's day you'd treat him like a king, becuase he beat Pascual Perez, a fighter that is even greater than the likes of Morales and Barrera. You'd ignore the fact that Perez was old and fading though, just like you do the fact that Barrera and Morales were when Pac beat them.

    Oh and anyone that has actually seen the fights and isn't a Thai nuthugger knows that Harada beat Kingpetch twice. I know it, I've seen both their fights.

    First intelligent thing you've done, refusing to speculate on a fighter you know nothing about other than what boxrec tells you.

    You can find some people to say anything. People have their delusions. This thread is a great indicator of that. Clear cut wins for Harada. Close but clear.

    As Rock said, the HOF is losing credibility with who is and isn't worthy of induction. Someone like Medel isn't even in the HOF, whereas someone like Daniel Zaragoza is. Now anyone that knows both fighters will easily tell you who the better fighter is, and I'll give you a hint, it's the one that isn't in the HOF.


    Medel and Kingpetch aren't even in the HOF. Johnny Famechon isn't either. Neither is Ebihara. But I'lll tell you this, fighters like Famechon and Ebihara are better than fighters like Marquez and a faded Morales.



    What is insulting is talking about fighters you haven't seen and what's even worse you don't have accurate reports about. I don't know why you feel confident to speak about fighters you know hardly anything about. Well actually I do, you're a Pac fan, not a boxing fan, but that just destroys your credibility, it doesn't enhance it.
     
  10. treva1977

    treva1977 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,784
    3
    May 23, 2008
  11. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    i thought pac's demolition of delahoya settled this debate?

    i think, even if pacquiao will beat hatton next, these experts would still not put pac over harada. they would have still make some points (excuses) as to why pac's win and accomplishments are not greater than harada. :-(
     
  12. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Dec 4, 2008
    :lol::lol::good

    we'll, the experts did already have an excuse... hoya was a "walking corpse" :-:)-((
     
  13. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007

    AGREE!

    If pac BEATS hatton. Hatton is shot!
    If Pac BEATS pbf. He is rusty! Haven't fought for over a year
    If pac BEATS valero. His resume stinks anyway!
    If pac BEATS campbell. He is already shot at 36
    If pac BEATS juan diaz. Campbell already beat him

    The list can go ON and ON.....!!!

    However, pac needs to beat a couple of boxers which has an immaculate record of 30-0 and another one with 43-0 on his weight divisions. Those boxers should have beaten a POTENTAIL HALL of FAMER!!!!
































































    In other words, PAC critics will NEVER give him the full credit he deserves coz they are looking for a non-existent boxer! THEY WILL ALWAYS HAVE A READY EXCUSE SO AS NOT TO GIVE FULL CREDIT:deal
     
  14. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Dec 4, 2008

    :lol::lol::lol::good:good
     
  15. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    94
    Dec 26, 2007
    If Pac beats Hatton there can really be no excuses based on Hatton's latest performance. I've always considered Hatton overrated, but if Pac can beat the legit #1 guy at 140, that would be huge, the biggest win of his career. He does that, he surpasses Harada in my book. Bookmark this post if you want to.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.