Wladimir Klitschko: The most disrespected Champion in boxing

That wasn't a cardboard cut out. :yep

 

:rofl

 

Yeah, he looked real ****ing dominant in there against Fat Sam, and the ghost of Rahman, avoiding exchanges like the way Siegfried and Roy avoid the Playboy Club at the Palm.

 

Uh, Scoop...we have had a few threads on it already.

Nobody is condemning Cotto by recognizing that the warrior called it quits, so that he may fight another day.

Your denial of the fact is an example of the kind of nuthuggery, groupyism, fandom, and apologetics that cause me to take issue with your work.

 

I know that you are disappointed. You keep watching... just hoping that someone lands a punch out of nowhere... and Wlad just never gives them a chance. He's just too good...I'm sorry.

 

Wlad will dominate the next 5 or so years. When he slows, some good skilled HW will come up and the passing of the torch will happen and Presscot will be there.

SEE I TOLD YOU IT WOULD HAPPEN!!!!

 

:yep

They are playing the game of averages. They have been at this **** for almost 5 years now. Outside of Marciano... there isn't a heavyweight in the world that doesn't lose sooner or later... and they are just waiting... waiting.. and waiting... and then acting like it proves something when he loses after over 5 years of straight wins against the best in the division. It's sad.

 

There's always an excuse.

The best one though is, Wlad isn't great because he's not exciting. He jabs too much and makes the HWs boring. He doesn't deserve to be an ATG.

Give me a ****ing break!

 

It's almost like playing Teddy Atlas game, you pick the underdog again and again till the underdog actually wins, then you can claim some sort of knowledge. :rofl

 

Yes. These "educated boxing fans" have no interest in watching a Champion completely dominate, dismantle, and stop his opponents. Like I said before... can you imagine what they would be saying if Rahman had done the EXACT same thing to Wlad? Do you think they would have talked about how boring Rahman was, or how pathetic of a performance it was? ****... they would have hoisted Rahman up as the savior of the division, and they would have went on and on about what an AMAZING performance it was. Can you imagine what half of these guys would have done if David Haye did that to Rahman? They would be using that performance as a reason why he would beat Wlad.

 

The bored would be filled with. Wlad is dodging Haye, so is Vitali. Look what Haye did to Rahman and Vitali ran scared.

Oh **** this forum would break. :rofl

I do understand that Wlad against Sultan was boring and refused to exchange for the awkwardness BUT he dominated him with just a jab. How many HWs can you say have done that, repeatedly?

 

The question alone speaks volumes. You didn't know the toughest dudes on the planet think Wlad's a ****? What country are you from? :rofl

 

Interesting how you never used that line after the Oscar/Mayweather fight :good

 

Actually I was hard on Haye for even thinking about debuting vs. Rahman after what Toney did to him. It's good to know Haye cared what the public thought.

 

Yeah... he cared so much that he decided to go up against Barrett. Who not only lost to Rahman, but was also knocked out in two rounds recently vs Cliff Couser.:rofl I know what you mean... luckily he listened to the public and took on a real top contender.