What was Marvin's Most Marvelous Performance against a natural Middleweight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Dec 27, 2008.


Page 1 of 2
  1. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Marvin Hagler is rightly regarded as one of the very best middleweights in history (personally I have him 4th after Greb, Monzon and Robinson).

    His stunning blitz of Thomas Hearns will never be forgotten, as it was perhaps the most intense and spectacular clash between two greats that we have ever seen.

    However, Hearns was a natural welterweight and Hagler did not utilize the wide array of his skills to defeat Tommy, he simply went for the kill from the first bell.

    In which of Marvelous Marvin's middleweight fights did you think he was most impressive all-round as a fighter?

    I haven't seen all of his mw fights, but I think he was excellent against Tony Sibson.

    Thoughts/opinions??

    :bbb
     
    DINAMITA, Dec 27, 2008
    DINAMITA, Dec 27, 2008
    #1
  2. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
    edit
     
    Bodysnatcher, Dec 27, 2008
    Bodysnatcher, Dec 27, 2008
    #2
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,976
    48,044
    Mar 21, 2007
    My opinion is that Hearns was a natural Middleweight...but that's arguable.

    Alan Minter.
     
    McGrain, Dec 27, 2008
    McGrain, Dec 27, 2008
    #3
  4. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Why would it???

    I am asking a question of people who have seen all of Marvin's fights at middleweight in case there are any hidden gems I haven't seen as I want to make a compilation dvd of the great mw's.

    I have seen all of B-Hop's mw defences so I don't need any tips on him.
     
    DINAMITA, Dec 27, 2008
    DINAMITA, Dec 27, 2008
    #4
  5. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Cheers McGrain. Your input would be appreciated on my "IN THE POCKET" thread just now.

    PS: Even if we took Hearns to be a natural mw, do you think it was the most impressive all-round performance of Marvin's career? Sure it was the biggest and most exciting, but I'm not sure if he really showed the best of the skills he possessed.
     
    DINAMITA, Dec 27, 2008
    DINAMITA, Dec 27, 2008
    #5
  6. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,019
    18,284
    Jul 29, 2004
    It depends what you like I guess...I think his domination of Antuofermo was excellent aswell and Sibson was certainly a great pick.

    The abrupt end the Scypion fight showed how devastating Marvin could be, as Hamsho II did seeing as though Mustafa had proven how tough he was in their previous encounter and every fight he was in up until then.

    Ive probably watched my copy of Hagler-Briscoe more then any other though...Hagler was really starting to hit his prime and it was an excellent display of boxing on the indside, outside, on the front foot and on the backfoot..He just showed why he will be remembered as one of the most well rounded, evenly proportioned and versatile fighters ever.
     
    WhataRock, Dec 27, 2008
    WhataRock, Dec 27, 2008
    #6
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,976
    48,044
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah. He bulled a harder hitting fighter with superior reach. You close the gap any way you can!
     
    McGrain, Dec 27, 2008
    McGrain, Dec 27, 2008
    #7
  8. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Fair enough. Hearns was the best fighter Marvin ever beat (mw Hearns being better than mw Duran).
     
    DINAMITA, Dec 27, 2008
    DINAMITA, Dec 27, 2008
    #8
  9. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    I believe Hearns was a natural 154 lb fighter (2nd best ever after McCallum, IMO), but your point is well taken, Dinamita.

    Mugabi was a 154 lber too, though like Hearns, he bulked up with incredible ease, and was effective long after his fight with Marvin.

    I'll go with Minter as well.
     
    Axe, Dec 27, 2008
    Axe, Dec 27, 2008
    #9
  10. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,047
    Apr 1, 2007
    Not really, Mugabi crashed and burned as hard as any fighter ever has.
     
    Russell, Dec 27, 2008
    Russell, Dec 27, 2008
    #10
  11. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    I like him against Antuofermo, but thats just me.
     
    TFFP, Dec 27, 2008
    TFFP, Dec 27, 2008
    #11
  12. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Why if you don't mind me asking?
     
    DINAMITA, Dec 27, 2008
    DINAMITA, Dec 27, 2008
    #12
  13. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    I think it showed what Marvin was all about, don't you think? I think it showed some of the more underrated aspects of his game too, there are certainly a few misconceptions surrounding Hagler. He boxed really well and showed what he learnt from the first fight that he let slip away.

    Minter is a solid pick too. Minter has been lost in time, excellent fighter in his own right.
     
    TFFP, Dec 27, 2008
    TFFP, Dec 27, 2008
    #13
  14. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    Yes really. He bulked up with ease, as I said. He looked incredibly fit at 168 and even 175.

    Further, simply because he was blown out by elite fighters in Mclellan and Norris, doesn't mean he was not "effective". :good

    He did put together a solid winning streak, and ended up capturing a world title at 154 lbs (his natural weight, IMO).
     
    Axe, Dec 27, 2008
    Axe, Dec 27, 2008
    #14
  15. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,019
    18,284
    Jul 29, 2004

    I saw him live at 175 and he looked terrible...his physique was still quite impressive but he wasnt half the fighter he was..and even that wasnt as good as a lot make out.
     
    WhataRock, Dec 27, 2008
    WhataRock, Dec 27, 2008
    #15
Page 1 of 2