salvador sanchez vs manny pacquiao who wins?

since round 6 is your concern... will you please address this concern of the pac fans... this is part of rd 3. KD or not?? it is a KD. should be for pac

This content is protected

 

To make the story short you are saying the judges are corrupt coz they made a mistake in scoring the round 6

BUT you were COMPLETELY SILENT when the judge made a mistake on the first fight that could have given the fight to PAC?!


Correct me if I'm wrong:
If I'm going to follow your arguement then the results could have been

first fight

PAC WINS

second fight

DRAW

Knowing you, you'll never agree that JMM actually lost


DAMN! i wish JMM wins something which will make his a star of his own right coz if he doesn't we'll be talking about this fight in the next three years or so...

WHY?! this is actually his greatest achievement!!!! Why? Coz this is the most talked about among all JMM's fights. Not his fight with casa or mab but particularly JMM's fight with PAC.


chEERS!

 

See what I mean about *******s. Somebody makes a solid point to counteract one of their own posts, and they simply take the football like in the PeeWees, and run with it in the wrong direction.:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

That gif was discussed at lenghth and shot down Bazooka style in this very own thread a few pages back, yet you bringing it back out Harrison, shows your lack of amunition or understanding of the sport.

I'd best advise you to sit back and read Harrison.....ask questions if you'd like, but dont post opinions........its getting embarrassing to read them.

 

pac got robbed out of a win in the first fight...second was dead evn...move on

 

you can pinch divac's ass the whole day but he would not accept that this is a knock down.

divac,

ask yourself this. why the hell did JMM held on the ropes if he knows he wouldn't fall?!

 

based on divac's arguement. this could have been the case


1st fight
if there was no error on the judges part.
pac would have won

(strangely when there was an error on the judges part on the first fight. the judge/s were not laballed as corrupt coz it favored JMM. It's just called human error)



2nd fight
there was an error on the judge/s part and did not favor JMM it's not called human error. It's being laballed as CORRUPTION!:rofl:rofl


****in' double standard of CORRUPTION!:deal

 

just rewatched the sixth round in slowmo and i see no corruption in giving it to Manny. close round could have gone either way.

i will break it down in gifs when i have time

 

you dont wanna discuss it because you got pounded on the other thread that most poeple had no problem calling it a KD :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

You're like a broken record Silvermags, you bring up the same subject over and over......and cut and paste the same shenanigans from months past.

For one, the first fight had a least 2 rounds given to Pac that were much like round 6 or their rematch.......

.....and secondly, the 10-7 round by one of the judges in fight one has been explained by the judge and the alphabet group satisfactorily for not being able to overturn it.

You can change a tabulation error, but you cant change what a judge writes on his scorecard.
If the masterscorer had made an arithmetic error as was done in MAB vs Juarez, they can go back and correct that, because it was an arithmetic error.
.......but you cant go back afterward and change what a judge has already written on his scorecard.
I dont think thats so difficult to understand, but somehow the *******s are unable to grasp that those are written rules for the scoring of a fight.

A judge cannot under any circumstance say "I made a mistake, I want to change the score of one of the rounds."

Once a judge turns in a scorecard at the end of a round, thats it, he cant get it back to change it under any circumstance.

The *******s love to harp on that 10-7 round that should have been 10-6, but completely turn a blind eye to at least a couple of rounds in that first fight that were scored exactly as round 6 of the rematch.......by that I mean rounds given to Pac that cannot be mistaken by even Pac's own Momma to go to anyone other than JMM!:deal

The ******* harps on the issue that goes against Pac, but turns a blind eye to obvious rounds like round 6 that are scored blatantly dishonestly.


ROUND 6 WAS NOT AN ERROR......
.....ITS CALLED CORRUPTNESS!!!!:deal

 

if we're talking about the rematch then round 6 is not one-sided at all. Neither Pac nor Marquez were even remotely hurt in that round. Both landed flush shots on each other. Its a damn close round i don't see what the big deal is


If you see corruption in that round then there is no reasoning with you.

don't forget that the judges are not listening to Lampley suck JMM's balls while they score the round.

 

Why waste your time with gif's who everyone knows was created by a *******.......post the whole round on a different thread and have the forum score the round on a public poll!

......and btw, I just rewatched that 6th round myself, and JMM was visibly moving Pac around that ring with right hands flush!


The nerve of a ******* to say Jim Lampley was sucking JMM's balls!
The same Lampley who that said late in the fight that JMM likely needs a KO to win!:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

You keep pulling excuses but to accuse Pacquiao of using corrupt judges is the lowest form of excuse and also complete bull****. And you base it on what? A round where Pacquiao wasn't even hurt. Shame on you *******.

 

Broken record... You the one who keeps on saying corruption when you don't like the results. But if you like the results you it's not called corrupt.

Simple as that! ALL the losses of JMM was blamed on corrupt judges PERIOD!

 

Not to start anything but.........Sanchez struggled with Nelson.He almost lost to Ford and the Castillo bout was razor close.He had a difficult time with Caldwell and Garcia went the full distance.Pac is just as good if not better then these guys.