Schmeling v. Holyfield

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Maxmomer, Dec 26, 2008.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,124
    48,357
    Mar 21, 2007

    My interest in the "he never beat a fighter as good as the one I am matching him with in this dream match" is almost zero. Of course. This is almost always the case.

    Not here though. Is a young, inexperienced Joe Louis better than Holyfield? Possibly not, but I think there isn't a great deal between them.
     
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,254
    25,606
    Jan 3, 2007
    I don't recall Scmeling ever fighting Marciano nor Peter ever fighting Holyfield, but since your heart is set on the whole posting random pictures ****, then who am I to deviate from your rules?


    This content is protected



    This content is protected




    This content is protected
     
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,254
    25,606
    Jan 3, 2007
    This content is protected




    This content is protected
     
  4. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,254
    25,606
    Jan 3, 2007
    This content is protected
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,124
    48,357
    Mar 21, 2007

    The pictures weren't random, nor were they posted in response to the thread title.

    As you know, they were posted in response to your claims that modern fighters are better trained and nourished. I posted them because they contradict this claim.
     
  6. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,254
    25,606
    Jan 3, 2007
    I think that if we limit the claims to the best men Holyfield fought, it might hold some validity. Of course Buster Douglas and a 42 year old Foreman don't do the claim much justice, but I think their are plenty others which back my feelings on the matter.
     
  7. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,534
    9,539
    Jul 15, 2008
    Holyfield by TKO ... then again without the juice who knows ?
     
  8. Bad_Intentions

    Bad_Intentions Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,367
    31
    May 15, 2007
  9. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,534
    9,539
    Jul 15, 2008
    Holyfield by TKO ...
     
  10. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    42
    Jun 28, 2007
    I'm going to say Holyfield by TKO (cuts) in the 12th round with it being about even on the cards.
     
  11. spittle8

    spittle8 Dropping Fisticuffs Full Member

    1,046
    4
    Dec 13, 2008
    Don't forget the circumstances of the second Louis fight, or the kidney punch, or the solar plexus punch. Under different circumstances I bet it would have been far more competitive.
     
  12. JIm Broughton

    JIm Broughton Active Member Full Member

    772
    22
    Feb 24, 2007
    Schmeling was good but I think a prime Holyfield would have been too much for Max. Holy was bigger and faster and utilized the jab and combination punching to a greater degree that the heavies of Maxs' day. Baer was a powerful puncher but he threw his shots one at a time and didn't throw a jab to set up his right. He just threw the right like a kid in a schoolyard fight. Evander was a much better boxer. And like previous posts pointed out, Evander fought much bigger men with better skills than Baer or Carnera et al. I just don't see a 185-190lb Max outboxing, outspeeding or hurting a prime Holyfield. At best I see Max losing a rather lopsided decision. At worst I see him being taken out midway thru the fight.
     
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,622
    27,309
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  14. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,254
    25,606
    Jan 3, 2007
     
  15. Quick Cash

    Quick Cash Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,718
    352
    Jul 12, 2007
    I think Holyfield was closer to Louis than Sharkey.