Best Chin: Naseem Hamed or Joe Calzaghe?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DINAMITA, Dec 29, 2008.


  1. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    :lol: Unbelievable. Take it like a man!
     
  2. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    take what like a man i have said what i said you have made up what i said and then posted what i said which is different than what you claimed i said, owned :hi:
     
  3. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    The evidence is there for all to see mate. Saying someone isn't better than someone means they are either as good as or worse. Royally owned you little liar! :happy
     
  4. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    saying some isn't really any better means they are about as good or there isn't much difference moron owned, you like to miss words out and then claim something out, it's like me saying your not a complete wanker but forgeting that i left the word not in. :hi: you little scottish ******
     
  5. stonerose

    stonerose Guest

    calzaghe has the better of the 2 seeing as though he has never actually lost or been in a huge amount of trouble. hamed ofen looked weak arond the chin but mostly due to the strange way he used to leave himself open . he cant have had that weak a beard, he was never stopped after all.
     
  6. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    :lol: This is the most dire attempt at wriggling out of being humbled by a fellow poster I have ever seen! You have amused me and for that I thank you kind sir!

    PS: You think there isn't really much difference between Michael Watson/Steve Collins and Richie Woodhall/Robin Reid, so you are a ******. Sorry.
     
  7. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    What's your opinion on this Stonerose, are Richie Woodhall and Robin Reid as good as Michael Watson and Steve Collins? I know you are a keen scholar of domestic middleweight boxing.
     
  8. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    i don't think as a level of oppositoon they are that much different, i explained why i thought this before but again with your lies you miss this out. Watson was a more talented fighter than the others but didn't do much because of the terrible injury so it's hard to judge how good he could have been. I think steve collins i very overated and there isn't much between him and reid, woodhall is the weakest of the lot but he was a world champion something which waton didn't manage robbed against eubank or not.
     
  9. stonerose

    stonerose Guest


    simple answer ....No.
    I like Hottikiller, he's a red like me but he's wrong on that and the scottish insult. reid and woodhall were good domestic and european fighters who did well to win world titles whereas in my opinion watson and collins were genuine world class operators . not a great comparison.
     
  10. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    You said they weren't any better, but they clearly clearly are. It's not my problem that you are a rather dim fellow. I suggest watching more of their fights so you will see that you were very wrong. Oh, and next time you dare someone to post an old comment of yours, be honest and then this won't happen to you again :good
     
  11. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    My sentiments exactly. A fool and a liar (check the previous page) we have here in Hotti_Killer.
     
  12. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    watson was ****ed before he could become a true world class operator so in that instance it's a judgement on a guy who never was and collins best wins were against eubank and been when they were gunshy and well past it losing to the other good fighters on his resume.
     
  13. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    missing words again :nonoyour a liar you never read the full quote
     
  14. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    :lol: This is becoming painful to read. You are wriggling like a worm on a hook. Check the previous page - you did say they weren't any better, you cannot deny that you did say this, and then you said that you didn't say it. Just admit it or **** off, you're embarrassing yourself turning this into a crusade, you lied and you are wrong about those boxers, get over it.
     
  15. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    i said they were not really any better get the quote right before you say anything, it is a different meaning.:patsch