He has no inside game and fights at "one pace" (not literally). This is pretty silly given that you're handing Wlad props for his great performance against Peter. Talk about limited.
Okay, this is true, in that sense he is limited. Ali had no inside game either. Didn't stop him from becoming the greatest heavyweight of all time. And certainly, Wlad doesn't lose much there because he is such much bigger than the rest. He simply ties them up and their entire inside game (and with that, entire game) is gone. On a sidenote, he used to fight on the inside. Barret and Shufford both were knocked down by very short left hooks on the inside. Well, i was pointing to the Peter fight to show Wlad's skill. The only reason he lost rounds in that fight is because of his weak chin; he won all rounds otherwise, and even at that, two of the knockdowns came from illegal punches. Second, i'm not saying Wlad is better than Louis. I'd pick Joe by TKO. I'm just saying that Wlad is several levels above the big men of his time. By the way, happy newyear. :good
*knock*knock* Valuev has a record of 50-1. And the only loss wasn't even an UD but an MD. Valuev _IS_ one of the most successful boxers ever. Carnera was 6'5.5'' and with 89-14 he too is one of the most successful boxers.
"Ali had no inside game either." I think his defensive in-game was pretty good when he was at his best, he made good space for countering Frazier whilst cornered, for example. Though overall, your point is taken. Yeah, my feeling on Wlad is that he is a very, very good fighter - a great one, in fact. But I also feel that he is perhaps the ONLY great HW champ to be definted by his weaknesses rather than his strengths. He is defined by his weak(ish) chin and his (percieved) lack of gas - Wlad has become brilliant at controlling the pace of the fight and the distance of that fight because of his weaknesses. I think that's why he produces so much frustration in fans. Happy New Year buddy.
So you think that by defeating John Ruiz x2 and Larry Donald he became one of most successful boxer of all-time.
About the Ali fights......the second was fixed and the first was competitive.When Ali got that substance in his eye in the break in the next round Sonny was punishing him and could have stopped him.
He didn't train at all for the fight and was past his prime.You figure it out+Ali was no pushover even then.
Valuev is 47-4 to all normal people after his well known losses.And he ain't succesful unless you are Sauerland. Carnera is somewhat better as he actually fought good fighters but he will always be looked like a freakshow cuz of his fixed fights altough he won the title legitimately.
There is plenty of footage where you can see Liston preparing for the Clay fight. Fact. Reporters were saying he was in the best condition of his life. Liston just came off his career best and most impressive performances (fact). All excuses of Liston being 50 years old, hadn't trained a second, etc, came AFTER he lost. As always. Certainly there's no shame in losing to Ali, of course, who looked as good as he ever did in my opinion. But given the above facts and the fact that Ali was never close to getting knocked down, let alone knocked out, makes it quite a ludicrous claim that Liston would've stopped him if he was in his 20's (which would be in the 1940's according to some people who explode his age to be able to live with the Clay fights).
Chris - I think Ali beats Liston 10.10 if we are taling any Ali other than the green one, but there are some things it is important to say about Liston v Ali. 1 - Liston was under the heavy influence of the mob. 2 - Liston was drinking in the run up to the fight. That's a fact too. And he wasn't drinking pre-Patterson. He might have been drinking once the Patterson I fight was made, there are stories. As you know, although I don't insist upon it, I feel the circumstantial is suggestive of a dive in I.