Froch, Haye and Hatton will get flattened in 09

they might be overated to a certain extent but they arent BUMS! shite post marmate

 

OK - and American boxing is really thriving these days....

Jeff Lacy - Manfredo - Malignaggi all hyped up by the US press until they got spanked

 

None of those fighters are "bums" you trolling clown. Haye virtually cleaned out the cruiserweights, Hatton has been the man at 140 for nearly 4 years and Froch is a decent world class boxer.

 

they're all top fighters
tough i do agree they will get beat this year

 

Hi Jeff. :hi:

D'you know what I find ridiculous? These idiotic posts from attention seekers such as yourself. :good

To call the best fighter at 140, a former undisputed cruiser champ and the current WBC super middleweight champ "bums" is nothing short of ******ed, but of course you already know that. :roll:

It is possible that these fighters will lose and it's nice to see you showing credit for a cruiser to step up and fight one of if not the best heavyweight today. Also, well done for pointing out that Hatton is looking to secure a fight with the regarded P4P best fighter in the world - again.

Finally, I can admit that a fighter I loathe in Froch actually suprised me and featured in a great fight in which he proved himself a worthy champion - and it's nice to see you doing the same.

Clown. :blood

 

OP fails at posting, and at avatars.

Yuk.

 

shitest post i have ever wasted my time reading!
if you say that about uk champions how about youe kelly pavlik or jeff lacy they were tagged "world class" by all in the US but they both got decked by real real world class fighters b-hop and calzaghe.
my honest response would be i think froch would lost to a fighter like kessler how ever i think he would beat the heartless jermain taylor, bika and the other contenders at 169 but only time will tell
however saying hatton will get sparked by a pac man left hand is over doing it a bit, at the end of the day hatton is a beast at 140 and is very very hard to hurt and pac isnt a huge puncher in any way.
haye v vitali will be a great match up how ever haye is a boxer and vitali doesnt have any where near the boxing skills haye has, he will never have fought a moving target like haye and will struggle however hayes chin is not the greatest and if tagged could be in trouble they both throw bombs so will be a great fight!

 

hatton & to a lesser extent haye are proven world class you *****

 

A few people in Canada do as well. I suppose that means the Canadians are guilty of hyping up their fighters too. :roll:

 

are they real tits you got there jeff,or did you have them implanted from your shitty brain,you dumb ass blondatsch

 

:rofl

 

hmm... if hatton is really the man at 140, why hasn't he fought any of the top guys in his division like kotelnik, holt, torres, bradley and witter. he instead picked on a small and weak malignaggi as well as an old, part-time fighter in lazcano. and don't forget his conquest of a shot castillo. if he ever decides to fight any of these top guys, he will certainly get beat.

 

witter got exposed by bradley as the pathetic bum with no heart he is. bradley cant attract flies to **** so why would hatton fight him for peanuts when he could fight a fighter with a bigger profile like paulie who is/ was the 2nd best fighter in the division till hatton dealt with him. kotelnik is a joke he holds the biggest joke of a belt in the sport beating a tiny umpa lumpa club level fighter in gavin reece again hatton would murder the pair of them and earn no money in doing so. if hatton took any of these fights instead of paulie or pac man or floyd mayweather ( the last two being the p4p best in the world) he would get ripped to shreds by every one on this forum and everyone who knows about the sport

as for the lazcano fight that was a come back fight after losing to the greatest fighter on the planet just like what de la hoya did against forbes so to say that was a pointless fight is beyond stupid

your clearly a idiot

 

So who else is the main man at 140? Hatton is "the man" because he beat the lineal champion Zoo, thats how boxing works. He also beat titlists in Maussa and Malinaggi (although the IBF stripped Paulie before the fight)

You can ask of most champions "why didn't he fight XXXXX?" but what have Bradley, Kotelnik, Holt, Torres etc actually DONE to be able to say they are better than or would beat Hatton? If you don't rate Malinaggi then fine but he was the number 1 contender at 140 according to the Ring before Hatton dominated and stopped him.

Are you just a ******* who feels the need to start hating Hatton because he's next up for Pac?