Bert Randolph Sugar on KLITschko

I think maybe you are taking this all a bit too seriously............you put so much hostility in one post.

Good GOD, man, .......Lighten up. Its only a mere internet forum. :good

 

Berts loaded.....Im suprised his breath didnt melt the mic

 

Dont hate on Bert. His spermazootas floating around in his used condoms know more boxing than you do.

 

And drink to much.

We live in 2008 not in 1950. A guy who is 6,6 ft. can not fight like the smaller heavyweights of the past. And this men had other personalties.


Wladimir is the best heavyweight in the world and in maybe 20 years he will be remberd as the last great Champion. Fighting all top 10 contenders, come back from from his losses and become again Champion.

Wlad will be in the HOF.

 

Are those martians shooting needles out of their eyes?

 

Wow... just wow.

 

Considering his talent, and the bums he is facing, Wladimir Klitschko should never have lost a fight. The fact that he has lost, and the miserable way he wins, says a lot about his heart. Playing a game of patty-cake with Ibragimov was absolutely disgusting, and the fans voiced their displeasure. Boxing is about throwing punches in an aggressive manner despite any danger posed your opponent. George Foreman learned that from Ron Lyle. Apparently Klitschko hasn't quite got the message.

 

Correct me where I'm wrong, Lewis' competition was clearly better than Wlad's, whose best win is either over little old Chris Bryd or the very green Sam Peter, Widdow, there's no denying how sad Wlad's resume looks.

For once Widdow you seem silent, I was really hopping to hear a good response from you, in a effort to convince me that Wlad's oppenents are actually decent, because you know I follow Wlad's career very closely, and I just dont see it.

 

:happy:good

 

You can expect everybody's resume to have the standard list of tomatoes for the salad. George Foreman has as many as anybody. What differs is the manner in which the salad gets eaten. Foreman devoured, or at least tried to devour, everything put in front of him. Klitschko is a picky eater.

 

Exactly how many times do you expect me to lay out the same argument for you? I can't even count the number of times that I have listed Wlad's opponents, where they were in their careers, their rankings, ect... I am honestly tired of typing the same things over and over again, especially when I am usually doing it in response to the same handful of posters. You simply fail to deal with reality when Wlad's opponents are listed, and you just revert back to acting like they aren't any good. I can't try to convince you that they are better than you choose to believe they are. Just like you sure as hell aren't going to convince me that Tyson in 2002 was better than Sam Peter.... or just about ANY of the guys that Wlad has beaten recently. Tyson was absolutely finished at that point in his career. You guys use fighters like Michael Grant as great wins for Lennox. Do you know how awful that is? When Wlad knocked out McCline, who took Grant out even faster than Lennox? Grant is NOT a big win for ANYONE's career.... let alone someone who is supposed to be Top 5 ATG. Neither is an over the hill Tyson, unless you consider Holmes win over Ali as a great achievement as well. How can I have a reasonable debate with people who consider Michael Grant, or Frans Botha a huge win for Lewis... but then attack names like Chris Byrd, Sam Peter, Sultan Ibragimov, Calvin Brock, ect...?

I have pointed out the fact that Lewis didn't fight a single one of the top 5 other best fighters in his own era during their primes... yet you ignore those types of facts, and act like I owe you some type of answer for the same question that I have answered numerous times already. Give me a few hours, because I am busy... I will start a thread... so that everyone can just refer back to it when asking me the same questions.

 

Fair enough Widdow, I believe a thread on this matter will clear up some things, as well as give other posters a chance to comment on what their opinion may be.