Damn, wasn't the reaction I was expecting. Now that I've failed to enrage you, I'll give you my honest answer. Tito's.
Tito had a great left hook but I would have to say Oscar's for two reasons. I consider it more devastating in that it came up from his waist in a sort of uppercut that made it impossible to see coming. I always see Tito's left hook as following a straight right. I think Tito's right hand was more devastating than his left hook as the right hand always started the damage that the left hook finished. Both great hooks though.
if u fought tito u would not see his left hook coming.....they are pretty even in that category but man tito had a vicious left hook
They both had a viscious left hook and were legendary I'm just saying I prefer one because it is more unique to that boxer in particular. Tito's hook is more classic. And yes, anyone that watches Tito's video knows that main damage to an opponen't is coming from his straight right. That's the shot I would be worried about "if I fought Tito." Oh yea, I'd ko him in two rounds. :bbb:bbb
Tito had more power but i would say De La Hoyas left hand in general was quicker, sharper and more accurate. Ask yourself how many of Titos left hooks landed on his oponents nut sack...
Oscar's was quicker and more versatile. he threw it from mulitple angles didn't need to plant his feet to land it effectivl the way Tito did. Oscar was pretty much a one handed fighter and still had the success that he did.
Correct me if I'm wrong but you come off as a Trinidad hater. I remember in a thread I made asking who would win in their primes Tito or Mosley, you gave Tito nothing but a puncher's chance and that is absolutely insane.:-(
For better or worse though Tito did punch the **** out of some balls though. I just watched the Corr fight last night and winced at that. I don't think he'd do it on purpose. I think he was just putting some body work in and got a bit careless.