I'm going to vote Trinidad based on his competition. Trinidad was able to bang with the elite consistently, and absolutely ****s up Joppy. Hamed couldn't swing for the fences so well against the elite in Barerra.
Naz had awsome one-punch power, more so than Tito. But Tito was the more skillful boxer, and didn't need to rely so heavily on the one punch KO's that Naz built his career on.
You know I notice that a lot with both Tito and Hamed Hoya. It seems that both are overrated and underrated in this forum. The ones who underrate these two fighters seem to focus too much on their losses. They talk too much about what they couldn't do rather than what they could do.
You seem to be saying that the reason I'm picking Tito is for his ability to move up in weight and knock bigger guys out. The reason I say Naz's power is overrated, and Trinidad should be credited as the harder hitter, is because Naz didn't knockout good opposition, whereas Trinidad did, and just as consistently. I will never forget what Trinidad did to Joppy, and Joppy was no mug and was the bigger man. Absolutely destroyed.
Great Post, finally some one with some sense here. I'm tired of people calling tito-dlh the "robbery" and the "schooling" of the century. I accept someone giving DLH a 7-5 decision but I personally thought it could have easily been a draw , not 9-3 or even 10-2 as some have suggested. At least Tito tried to engage his opponent , DLH was afraid to go toe to toe. But on the other hand, agree with my boy Tito4eva's analysis. Naz one punch power, Tito two punch power.
The higher Tito went up in weight the more hard casting he used. Nobody will escape the Tito punch except for Bernard because he was smart.
i think so too. look at the guy's tito starched and they were of better quality than the guy's hamed has taken out.