Joe Frazier .vs. Mike Tyson

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by la-califa, Jan 5, 2009.


  1. Bad_Intentions

    Bad_Intentions Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,367
    31
    May 15, 2007
    Man i got love for joe and all, he throws the best left hooks of all heavyweights i've seen especially to the body, but tyson takes this, too much pressure and quickness, but IT WILL NOT BE EASY!.
     
  2. Mike T

    Mike T Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,873
    117
    Jun 13, 2006
    I keep reading that Joe would beat him up on the inside. Prime Tyson won't let that happen.
     
  3. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,465
    Sep 7, 2008
    I think Tyson had the edge in chin...I'd go for Kid Dynamite. Stoppage within five.
     
  4. round15

    round15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,370
    45
    Nov 27, 2007
    The Frazier that got annihilated by Foreman was nowhere near the same fighter that was the dominant champion from 1967-1970.

    Foreman had an easy time with a Joe Frazier that was far from his prime weight and prime shape. Prime Frazier may taste the canvas once or twice early against Foreman, but I'd bet on him to do significantly better and perhaps stop Foreman late.

    George would have had a much tougher time facing a PRE-FOTC conditioned Joe Frazier and he'd be hard pressed to hit him as cleanly as he did in 1973.

    As for Tyson, he doesn't have the height or reach advantage that George has against Frazier, so it would be a lot easier for Frazier to hit Tyson.
    People forget that the man had two hands, although he was primarily known for his left hook. Head movement was a focal point of his offense and Joe made one of the fastest and arguably the best heavyweight of all time in Ali, miss many punches.

    Prime Frazier, PRE-FOTC would be a very tough assignment for every heavyweight in history, and nobody stops this version of Frazier inside the middle rounds, not even Foreman or Liston, who many on this forum say destroys Frazier quicker than Foreman.
     
  5. True Writer

    True Writer Active Member Full Member

    640
    5
    Mar 2, 2007
    Tyson was much harder to hit than dumb Foreman!

    Tyson never had a height or reach advantage against any opponent but in his prime it didn't matter he just knockedthem out in the 1st.
     
    moneytheman12 likes this.
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,136
    13,085
    Jan 4, 2008
    True (more or less). But his KO record in fights that went more than 5 rounds isn't really a flattering read.
     
  7. True Writer

    True Writer Active Member Full Member

    640
    5
    Mar 2, 2007
    But this wouldn't go 5 rounds
     
  8. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,136
    13,085
    Jan 4, 2008
    You may very well be right. Tyson has to be seen as the favourite, I guess. I also have a hard time seeing Frazier getting past the early onslaught.
     
  9. la-califa

    la-califa Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,292
    53
    Jun 12, 2007
    Then again, how much would the corner's come into effect? Eddie Futch was one of the greats. If Bonecrusher Smith & Mitch Green could hold & tie up Tyson to last into the late rounds why not Frazier? At least to the point to where Tysons lack of stamina would take effect. Then Frazier could take over. Tyson's origional corner would take this into consideration, but not Don King's lackey's who came in later. & would be clueless of what to do. Like against Buster.
     
  10. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,136
    13,085
    Jan 4, 2008
    Frazier was no clincher. He wouldn't, and couldn't, have used that tactic.

    Smith et al. had the size to smother Tyson, Frazier didn't. And more importantly, it wasn't in his reportiore. He never tried to clinch when hurt.
     
  11. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,104
    25,231
    Jan 3, 2007

    There are three problems with this theory.

    1. Frazier did not have the size or strength adavantage over Tyson the way that Green and Smith had. These were two 6'5", 225+ heavys. Joe would actually be the smaller and possibly less strong of the two.

    2. You assume that Tyson had stamina issues in his prime. Based on what? He went 12 rounds on three occasions against Smith, Tucker, and Ruddock. He went 10 rounds at least 3 times against Tillis, Green and Ribalta. He won all of these fights. The Douglas loss was a result of a sustained beating over 10 rounds, and more or less a fight where Tyson was not fighting to win. You could make the argument that none of these men were of Frazier's calibur, but if we're going to start in on that, then we could also say the same thing in reverse about Oscar Bonavena who extended Frazier the distance twice and had him floored on two occasions.

    3. It would be all well and good if Frazier could tie Tyson up and neutralize his attacks for most of the rounds. But, he'd still have to take a hell of a lot of hard shots, and ones that probably packed more velocity in a single punch than Foreman's did. We should also consider that Tyson was not clean when on the inside. He had the tendency to elbow, and do other things when he wasn't getting his way.
     
  12. la-califa

    la-califa Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,292
    53
    Jun 12, 2007
    Just stating that this could be a strategy option. Just like the fighters you mentioned. Tyson could not deal with fighters who were intent on tying him up and lasting the distance. But I doubt seriosly if Frazier would adopt this tactic. Most likey he would come out firing, the fight ending one way or the other. Big Tyson Advantage. But Frazier would have to be incredibly disiplined to tie up Tyson until the late rounds. & Tyson does hit incredibly hard, which makes this tactic very dangerous indeed. And staminawise, I really don't see Tyson going the distance, like Frazier did against Ali. After the seventh or eighth, Tyson would slowdown and throw one or two punches at a time, just to keep the opponent honest. to cruise to a victory.
     
  13. $.02

    $.02 Undisputed Heavyweight Full Member

    541
    1
    Dec 12, 2008
    This would be a very easy fight for a Prime Mike Tyson. Tyson had Frazier beat in every department except stamina. Tyson put together his punches better, had more speed, threw more combos, had better head movement, and superior punching power.

    This fight will end within 5 rounds, with Tyson knocking him out.
     
  14. groove

    groove Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,056
    26
    May 16, 2006
    Buster Douglas found Tyson easy to hit and we all know Tyson didn't have the heart of a Joe Frazier. If it goes more than 5 rounds then Frazier wins. Tyson has to win early. That's possible but no way will Frazier easily fold like most of Tyson's 80s opponents.
     
  15. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    Because if you survived more than 5 rounds against Tyson, you obviously have a very good chin and in the majority of those fights his opponents were fighting to survive. If you survived Tysons initial onslaught you were either very, very good or hanging on for dear life.