Reason Why Pacquaio vs JMM Is Considered So Controversial

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by smitty_son408, Jan 13, 2009.


Page 1 of 2
  1. smitty_son408

    smitty_son408 J ust E njoy T his S hit Full Member

    6,030
    12
    May 3, 2008
    I just finished reviewing both fights from an unbiased point of view and IMHO i feel that Pacman won both fights by close decisions, but the reason that he won both fights are what makes it seem that JMM got the shaft.

    The reason being that the KNOCKDOWNS ARE WHAT COST JMM BOTH FIGHTS!!! In the first fight if he gets knockdown one time less, then you then have an argument and if he doesn't get knockdown in the second fight then I still have him losing by 1 point (with rounds 8 & 12 being very close).

    I think the first fight was a close manny win and i thought the second fight at the worst should have been a draw with the knockdowns costing JMM dearly. I had it 6 rounds a piece in the 1st fight and 7-5 for Manny in the second

    Opinions
     
    smitty_son408, Jan 13, 2009
    smitty_son408, Jan 13, 2009
    #1
  2. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Why not find an old thread about it?

    Rehash it and see if you can get actual educated posters to contribute to the thread, instead of the *******ed opinions that are sure to come?

    Nothing but *******s come into threads like this which are done what seems like every couple of days.

    Go back to the forum archives dated March 2008 and get educated my friend!
     
    divac, Jan 13, 2009
    divac, Jan 13, 2009
    #2
  3. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Dec 4, 2008
    apparently this recycled topic was discussed gazillion times..

    some people ^^^ just doesnt know how to move on with their life...

    am I correct divac?? :yep:yep;)
     
    harrison, Jan 13, 2009
    harrison, Jan 13, 2009
    #3
  4. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004

    Seems to me like its you who consistently dominates these recycled threads with your presence.
    I suggest you go back to the March 2008 archives for a little education yourself.:deal
     
    divac, Jan 13, 2009
    divac, Jan 13, 2009
    #4
  5. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Believe there was a Draw.
     
    Marnoff, Jan 13, 2009
    Marnoff, Jan 13, 2009
    #5
  6. smitty_son408

    smitty_son408 J ust E njoy T his S hit Full Member

    6,030
    12
    May 3, 2008
    ^^^ yes, but with knockdowns manny should of been awarded the decision.
     
    smitty_son408, Jan 13, 2009
    smitty_son408, Jan 13, 2009
    #6
  7. watsinango

    watsinango Active Member Full Member

    1,495
    0
    Feb 17, 2008
    No controversial here.. only JMM huggers made it. Unfortunately the "best excuse" to JMM lossed was not yet discovered, so whinning will always continue.:lol:

    harrison is the best antidote to divac's reasoning, this two made evry thread like this soooooo lively.:nut
     
    watsinango, Jan 13, 2009
    watsinango, Jan 13, 2009
    #7
  8. watsinango

    watsinango Active Member Full Member

    1,495
    0
    Feb 17, 2008
    those legit KD (exclude the rope clinging) is not an insurance to win a fight, but for a boxer w/ JMM caliber, its a total lifetime embarassment and unforgivable. thats why he always acted like a baby.
     
    watsinango, Jan 13, 2009
    watsinango, Jan 13, 2009
    #8
  9. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Dec 4, 2008
    i love divac :p:good
     
    harrison, Jan 13, 2009
    harrison, Jan 13, 2009
    #9
  10. rjamesd1

    rjamesd1 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,884
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    That's what it's suppose to be. 2-0 for PACQUIAO. Only fools believe PACQUIAO being schooled. Because if schooling really took place, it's should have resulted into a UNANIMOUS DECISION for JMM. PACQUIAO took some beating too, undeniably, but not enough to knock him down or lose. But JMM can rest in peace because he's the only one that came close to winning against PACQUIAO, if only he can avoid not getting knocked down with his feet in the air. CASE CLOSED! :hat
     
    rjamesd1, Jan 13, 2009
    rjamesd1, Jan 13, 2009
    #10
  11. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004

    Post of the year!

    Truer words have not been spoken!:deal:yep

    If you're a *******, you simply throw reasoning out the window when it comes to dealing with anyone that is reasonable!:D:lol:
     
    divac, Jan 13, 2009
    divac, Jan 13, 2009
    #11
  12. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    :smooch
     
    divac, Jan 13, 2009
    divac, Jan 13, 2009
    #12
  13. yesihavearm2

    yesihavearm2 ESB Chinchecker Full Member

    9,890
    5,155
    May 30, 2008
    At least he didnt get knocked down by a jab huh ?
     
    yesihavearm2, Jan 13, 2009
    yesihavearm2, Jan 13, 2009
    #13
  14. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Alright, the fact that you believe knockdowns = win demonstrates that you don't understand how fight scoring goes. I'm glad you showed this sooner rather than later. Will save me time debating.

    I'm not arguing about the actual scoring of the fights here, just you clearly do not know how it works.
     
    Marnoff, Jan 13, 2009
    Marnoff, Jan 13, 2009
    #14
  15. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Dec 4, 2008
    at least not on his prime when he was eating once a day :lol::yep:good

    if you were on your prime then that's a big problem :good

    but wait, it was a low blow, right? then not legit !
     
    harrison, Jan 13, 2009
    harrison, Jan 13, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 2