Arreola is a fat, greasy, plodder, a predictable, stumbler, i wish he would fight Peter who would KO THE fat ****er inside of 6 rounds :good.. The fact that Arreola is the best bet of American heavyweight's, just shows how pathetic the Heavyweight's of the USA are! **** POOR just like the American economy.
telling from his last performance against klitschko im wondering how he can come back from such a horrible performance.i mean klitschko made him look like an amatuer.arreola has a good chance against peter,imean weve seen peter in trouble before and also the other way around.it could go either way but arreola comes in good shape and focused he could get the win.peeeeeeeaaaaaaaacccccccceeeeeeeeeee
Trust me, you're not missing anything. Envision some drunken fat guy at your local bar plodding some poor ******* half his size because he thought somebody was looking at his girlfriend - that's Arreola.
Very tough question to answer. Both men look like they could clear out an "All you can eat" buffet table in under 5 min.
Are you all serious? Did you not see Peter in his last fight? In all honestly, the man has had 3 bad fights in a row. He almost lost to McCline, was put on ***** street a few times by a VERY old Oleg coming off a year and 1/2 layoff and got his ass handed to him up down and sideways by a 37 year old coming off a 4 year layoff. The mans best punch is a rabbit punch and would either get DQ'd or get KO'd in under 5 by Arreola. Arreola has almost no skill by any stretch but would beat Peter.
for a second I thought you were going to say "...and Peter has more of them." Peter and Arreola are really in many ways mirrors of each other. big, slugging, plodding, unfocused, under conditioned, under motivated. I'd like to see this fight. :thumbsup "Battle of the Bulges"