Hey before i start dont get me wrong im not a pac man hater, what he has done is impressive. i do think hes got a little to much smoke up his ass after the de la hoya fight, lets just say the best de la hoya didnt turn up. never the less still a bloody good win but in my opinion i really do think jmm beat pac both times they met, iv got both the fights and no matter how many times i watch i cant manage to see how jmm didnt win both fights? so let me know what you think cus i feel sorry for the bloke, i mean all the hype and money round pac would of been all his. Im not trying to start any slagging matches between pac fans and jmm fans just really want to know if im just being a dick or if any one else sees it my way!
they are both close fights but i have pac on the first and jmm on the second so they need a third fight to settle it.
" i feel sorry for that bloke, i mean all the hype and money round pac would of been all his" personally i feal pac deserves all he has got because of his exciting style. even if marquez won both fights i dont think he would be where pac is today because of his style. avid boxing fans admire his skills but the average fan wouldn't get excited. he is not a ppv star.
Jmm and Pac, For my own opinion... No matter how many times they fight, It will be always go on either way...
i've got Pac winning both fights. i think JMM just has the perfect style to beat Pac and at the same time JMM is a really amazing fighter, the 2nd best in the world right now. In my eyes its crazy how even when facing the worst possible style, Pac still managed to win both fights. Shows how he's really on a level of his own.
Ok i see what your saying he would draw the bigger crouds but just feel he was robbed cheers tho mate!
Pac seems too over eager and tense when he fights JMM. He is weary of JMM's punches and I swear there are times in their 2 fights that after Pac threw a punch, he seems to freeze for a split second seemingly expecting to get counterpunched.
No problem with that bro. I...like many others are on the opposite side of the fence. JMM did very well but IMHO he just fell short not once but TWICE to PAC. I've watched both fights numerous times and still come out with the same conclusion...that the fights were HELLA close, but there was a clear winner and that was PAC by 1 and 2 rounds in each of their meetings in the ring. I agree that the best DLH did not show up, but what PAC showed was tremendous improvment and versitility against a GREAT fighter. Sure the win can be met with some critisim due to how DLH looked, but a lot of that can be contributed to how PAC preformed. DLH "WINDS" were taken from his "sails" by PAC banging him out form the jump. Either way JMM is a terrific fighter and deserves respect. I just feel JMM wont be able to beat his nemisis anytime they fight. His best chance was to beat PAC after JMM got a gift draw. That PAC was FAAAAR from how complete and dynamic he is today. JMM vs PAC now is a fight I'm confident PAC would win in more devastating fashion.
They only "Robbery" that took place was the championship that PAC won in their first fight. Grant it.....the fight was close but it's on record and a proven FACT that had the judge scored Round 1 correctly PAC would have had a record of 2-0 vs JMM. But he had to settle for 1-1 vs the great Mexican warrior. The rematch was close...I felt it was CLEAR PAC won by 2 rounds easily, but some had JMM winning. I wouldn't call that a robbery...just a poor decision IMHO. In a close fight there is no reason to call robbery...unless something like what happened at PAC's expense surfaces in the first meeting between the two fighters.
I got you kid. You just don't understand the way that term is thrown around so loosely round this message board. We're good.:good
Sorry pal new to this forum but im starting to notice things like that, ill watch what i say, but you are right no way could you call it a robbery, far to close for that should of frased it different! i thought he was unlucky would of been better!