Is Pacquiao Trying To Price Out Of The Hatton Fight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by san rafael, Jan 15, 2009.


  1. kukoy

    kukoy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,404
    0
    Jun 13, 2006
    Well bud, I am not working right now but I do not share your view.

    I got where I was because I earned it. I feel what all the jobless out there feel right now. Boxers, though, risk their lives everytime they enter the ring. It is their job. There are hundreds of boxers and very few are given the chance to big pay days. I am sure they earned it. If Pac feels that's what he's worth, so be it. I myself though think 50/50 is right.
     
  2. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    This isn't a Middle Eastern marketplace though. Bluffing isn't looked upon kindly in the real business world.
     
  3. canuckpunch

    canuckpunch Member Full Member

    292
    0
    Jul 31, 2008
    A lot of Pacquiao's money goes to homeless, jobless, sick, scholarship programs.

    Hatton needs that extra 4M for his party fund.
     
  4. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,284
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    nope.

    60/40 isnt unreasonable.
     
  5. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Elaborate if you would..
     
  6. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,284
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    man, we got thousands of pages & hundreds of threads which explain 'why' on both sides. heres my quick & personal view....

    1) pac is the #1 p4p king and has earned the right to demand more based on overall accomplishments from past to present.

    2) the upset over oscar essentially put pac in the driver seat, for he had lost, hatton could have demanded more $ & had a shot at fighting him @ wembley.

    3) i understand that ricky is a huge draw in the UK with millions to be made through tickets & ppv in which pac couldnt produce anymore with any other fighter right now. -but pac could fight floyd 1st (which he'd rather do) -lose, and a mega fight with hatton would still be there.

    4) ricky needs this fight more for his legacy than pac.
     
  7. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Thanks for taking the time. For myself; the numbers are strictly it. They don't pay Daniel Day Lewis more than Tom Cruise because he's a better actor. You know?..
     
  8. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    I highly doubt he'd try to price himself OUT of a fight. This is just a part of negotiation.
     
  9. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Possibly so, Lance. I don't see how they can turn this down.

    The way that Pacquiao went back a second time, and made a demand he knows clearly by now will not fly with the other side is what has some of us confused. Egos within Top Rank seems to be the cause of it all. Manny is in Elvis mode these days..
     
  10. Carlos Primera

    Carlos Primera Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,114
    4
    Jan 8, 2007
    nah. pac's just trying to get more money at the bargaining table.
     
  11. zerocool1523

    zerocool1523 Active Member Full Member

    1,318
    0
    Jun 23, 2008
    the answer is no. he's just trying to get he's true worth.:smoke
     
  12. owell

    owell Active Member Full Member

    1,464
    0
    Jul 20, 2008

    Aren't we being the greedy one?...
     
  13. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    7,856
    0
    Mar 8, 2008
  14. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    It is as well a 10% that Hatton felt he could live without.

    It's extremely important to Pacquiao though. Extremely.
     
  15. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,284
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    more extreme for ricky, no?