Interview & Thoughts from Jack Loew...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by walk with me, Jan 16, 2009.


  1. québecwarrior

    québecwarrior Georges 'Rush' St-Pierre Full Member

    6,938
    0
    Jun 5, 2007
    you are the one whos ****in ridiculous, that wasnt the point I was making you idiot

    Look at the difference between KP in first Taylor bout, and watch after that his fight vs Taylor, he was SLUGGISH and CRUDE, and he was WORSE vs Hopkins.
    Hopkins would still had beat him yes, but I dont care, i'm talking about JUST PAVLIK and that the weight is making him sluggish.
     
  2. québecwarrior

    québecwarrior Georges 'Rush' St-Pierre Full Member

    6,938
    0
    Jun 5, 2007
    cet imbécile la est toujours sur le forum avec ses dizaine de milliers de posts en moin de un an a lancer des chiffres pis faire a semblant quil a des connections pour savoir lultime vérité
     
  3. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    And Jack Lowe making a point size was the difference Pavlik lost is a much more reliable right?I tend to believe HBO over Lowe.
     
  4. Little Pea

    Little Pea 'A' grade boxing fan Full Member

    11,750
    1
    Dec 7, 2007
    I say its about even in reliablility. Thats why i wont ***** like you.
     
  5. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Haha I'm bitchin?When you started this?Hhaha
     
  6. Little Pea

    Little Pea 'A' grade boxing fan Full Member

    11,750
    1
    Dec 7, 2007
    ALright. Forget it then.
     
  7. diamondDave

    diamondDave Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,264
    11
    Jul 21, 2004
    Loew is an ok trainer but he has taken Pavlik as far as he is going to go. I am really disturbed by the fact that it comes to a surprize to Mr. Loew that guys don't fight their best when they are sick and can't spar. KP needs to bring another trainer into camp because I am sure there are a lot of other things that Loew hasn't learned yet that a top fighter needs to know.
     
  8. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    I thought the same, but decided just to stay out of this. :lol: I just kind of learn which sources I can trust, and which....... well.......
     
  9. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    Point still is, in the Taylor rematch he faced a totally different animal than in the first, in the Hopkins fight he faced a totally different animal than anything hes ever fought before.

    He's gonna look 10/10 against gun slingers, Hopkins didnt gunsling, he just took two steps backward, Pavlik followed him in a straight line and he took him off balance like easy pickings.
     
  10. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Yep. The guys that hold the tape in such a manner that a boxers reach changes an inch or two from fight to fight....:D
     
  11. québecwarrior

    québecwarrior Georges 'Rush' St-Pierre Full Member

    6,938
    0
    Jun 5, 2007
    Put Pavlik against Froch at 168 right now, and I swear to you that he will look exactly like he did vs Taylor 2, that extra weight is making him sluggish.
     
  12. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    He would look like "the good old" Pavlik because he'd have a stationary target in front of him, he would be able to plant his feet and throw instead of making sure he doesnt get hit before planting his feet.

    Thats where it is at.
     
  13. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    I have to disagree. I think Pavlik looked good in his second Taylor fight. Froch? Pascal sure helped him out in their fight. More like a school yard brawl. Based on that fight I'd think any disciplined boxer could take Froch apart. That is the only fight I have seen of his though.