should hatton tell pacman to **** off and find another fight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by treva1977, Jan 15, 2009.


  1. roly

    roly Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,775
    8
    Aug 11, 2005

    lol we posted the same thing at the same time :good
     
  2. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    im laughing at this

    Tszyu he fought him 2 get the ring magazine belt
    collazo he was lucky to beat and none of hattons belts were on the line
    maussa is a clown who isnt even a world level fighter
    Urango is powerful but limited
    Mayweather i give him so dues but again none of his titles were on the line.
    mallinagi was overhyped and outgunned

    Im big enough 2 say in all this that hatton can be impressive but if you look closely hes nothing special and avoided compitition which would have been in with a chance of beating him
     
  3. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    So in summary, you criticise Hatton for everytime he took on a champion on the basis that you consider them 'limited', then criticise him for avoiding limited paper titleholders like Witter, who you think he should have fought solely because they were champions?
     
  4. Barneyg23

    Barneyg23 New Member Full Member

    60
    0
    Oct 23, 2008
    i think they should do, who ever wins get the 60% and who ever loses gets the 40% then who ever wins gets the fair amount but, if it has to be negotiated before the fight, pac should get the 60% as he brings way more fans.
     
  5. onepunch.net

    onepunch.net Active Member Full Member

    1,314
    0
    Mar 7, 2007

    as evidenced by WHAT? His whopping 165k buys against David Diaz 1 fight ago??? Hatton can do a million plus buys in the UK fighting a cab driver.

    No other opponent Pac could choose would bring that UK revenue that Hatton does.
     
  6. zerocool1523

    zerocool1523 Active Member Full Member

    1,318
    0
    Jun 23, 2008
    ^
    finally somebody who understands pac:good.
    anyone says pac is being greedy is an ignorant fool.
     
  7. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    4,863
    1
    Feb 14, 2006
    ah. pac-diaz was 250k not 165k. that 165k, actually 180k is for the jmm-barrera fight.
     
  8. zerocool1523

    zerocool1523 Active Member Full Member

    1,318
    0
    Jun 23, 2008
    my answer is take the 60/40. but i doubt he'll punish pac. i think it will be the other way around.:deal
     
  9. onepunch.net

    onepunch.net Active Member Full Member

    1,314
    0
    Mar 7, 2007
    pac-diaz did not do 250k buys.
     
  10. LiamE

    LiamE Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,391
    3
    Nov 3, 2007
    Pac needs to realise he might be P4P champ but he aint the man at Hattons weight and more importantly he cant draw like Hatton can.
     
  11. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    4,863
    1
    Feb 14, 2006
    hatton can only draw in the UK. it is pac who is the draw in the US where the fight will be held if it happens at all.

    pac has also issued an ultimatum to hatton just like what the hatton team did to him. he said that if the split doesn't move from 50/50 by Feb. 1, hatton should forget about fighting him now or in the future.
     
  12. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    4,863
    1
    Feb 14, 2006
    yes it did. google it if you don't believe me.
     
  13. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    46,700
    14,162
    Mar 5, 2006
    it didn't even sell past 9000 at mandalay bay. pretty pathetic if you ask me..
     
  14. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    4,863
    1
    Feb 14, 2006
    well, same with hatton vs. malignaggi at MGM Grand which also wasn't even a PPV fight in the US. more pathetic if you ask me, them being the two best fighters @140.
     
  15. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,284
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    and hatton-malignaggi only sold 175-200k ppv buys in the uk.