Who thinks Pac SHOULD be getting more than Hatton?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bill poster, Jan 17, 2009.


  1. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Pac should definately get more. He has the upper hand here. Hatton needs this fight more than Pac in terms of his legacy. According to some reports, he made $40 million against Mayweather. If that's the case, then he shouldn't be worried about money. He's already lined his pocket enough by beating crap opposition with his boring hit and hold tactics. If Hatton doesn't like getting the smaller cut, then he can go **** himself.
     
  2. bill poster

    bill poster Guest

    Mayweather needs Pac more than pac needs him.
     
  3. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,284
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    :lol:
     
  4. Scotty321

    Scotty321 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,516
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    Hattons popularity slightly dipped after his 1st loss, but its back to sky high now..

    What has Paccy done in a PPV when he was the only big name fighter? Do you think he would have done better numbers if he had fought Paulie Malignaggi?
     
  5. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Hatton should consider himself lucky that he has a chance to elevate his status against a guy like Pacquiao. His legacy at this point is ****ing shitty compared to Pacquiaos

    To top it off, Hatton has the size advantage. He should be jumping all over this fight regardless of the split. He has nothing to lose.
     
  6. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,284
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    well for one, the fight would have been an official ppv event. second, the fight would have probably sold more than he did against larios, solis, & diaz.
     
  7. retriever

    retriever Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,057
    29
    Jan 20, 2006
    PAC would take the fight even if the split is 55-45. He just asking for respect because he did more for boxing than Ricky did. Plus the fact that he's the best boxer P4P today.
     
  8. maracho

    maracho Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,137
    1
    Mar 17, 2007
  9. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    There should be a limit to these superfights, and there should be a standard on who gets who basing on who is the camp or the more popular fighter. That way, there's no room for negotiations.
     
  10. jaois138

    jaois138 Dinamita Full Member

    679
    0
    May 24, 2008
  11. viperguy

    viperguy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,627
    0
    Jan 21, 2005
    50/50 is ok but if Pac wants 60/40 there's nothing wrong with that. There's no doubt Pac is the bigger draw here. 60/40 is all due to respect. Remember when Mosley gave away 12mills to rematch Oscar and took like 3mills to fight Wrights. That was a dumb move but just for respect.
     
  12. D_XZ

    D_XZ Member Full Member

    470
    0
    Jun 21, 2008
    A more important point is how much of the cash goes to the undercard?
    I'm sick of nights based around one single big name match and a load of garbage warmups. The PAC-DLH one has got to be rock bottom - surely somebody has got to learn from that.
     
  13. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007

    +1

    Fair enough..
     
  14. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007

    Wake up bro! PBF is already!

    pbf vs pac
    pbf vs hatton II
    pbf vs cotto
    pbf vs margarito

    Pbf vs xyz boxer

    would not happen coz pbf already retired. Simple as that.
     
  15. ku_las

    ku_las Active Member Full Member

    503
    0
    Mar 7, 2008
    Just like the others, I just want to see the fight and I don't care who gets more...