If Hatton wins vs Pac, will you rank him ahead of Calzaghe in P4P rank?

you can't really coun the very low weights as he was very young at the time, hatton althougth very strong has the measurments of a superfeatherweight, althougth i agree pacman is the smaller guy i only really think there is maybe one weight class in the natural weights.

 

There has been some right tits with there one line insults instead of a valid argument. I'm just suprised that you ever bother to reply

 

**** ESPN.

The Ring says 3. Thats what all debates are based around when asking, for example, "How many P4P fighters has so and so beat", or whatever the ****, it's always the Ring, whether you like it or not. Would you go by Boxrec aswell?.

 

As I said pages ago, what we have here are a couple of fake novice rank amateur part-time cheerleading fighter-fan big-fights-only three-fights-a-year fanboy ****rags. Taking the p4p rankings from a tv station? Get the **** out of here. :hi:

 

No he's P4P 2 in boxing monthly,boxing news, and he number 2 in my list

I don't like the ring it seems to be slightly biased sometimes as most mags I suppose

 

The fact remains that the man was an adult who won a world title at flyweight. He spent the majority of his career 122-130lbs. Hatton has spent his career at 140-147lbs. These facts we cannot argue with. Thus, Pacquiao is a naturally smaller lower-weight fighter. Cut and dried.

 

Never use ESPN's rankings they suck.

 

waffle,waffle,flyweight,waffle,p4p,waffle,wiffle......zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

Disappear.

 

Yet more brilliant logic and formidable reasoning from this ESPN genius.

 

they are niot greta facts though the measurements of both guys suggest that in natural size they are not that far apart, i am not saying pacman isn't smaller but lets not make out its a massive difference in reality pacman is 130 fighter and hatton 135-140

 

I don't have much work on today and I enjoy educating the noobs

 

yeah i would agree with that.

 

Nothing in the post you are responding to can be argued with, it is all fact, and that is my position, I have no need to re-state it yet again.

 

i disagree there body measurements and stats have been posted and pacman was bigger in almost every measurement making me think there is not a giant amount of difference. Just becuase someone fights at a weight class it does not mean it's their natural weight look at chris byrd don't tell me he was a natural heavyweight just because he foguht most of his fights there.