If Hatton wins vs Pac, will you rank him ahead of Calzaghe in P4P rank?

Nope this ranking is better

1 Calzaghe
2 Pac
3 JMM
4 Hatton

 

Yes but none of this changes any of the facts contained in this post:

The fact remains that the man was an adult who won a world title at flyweight. He spent the majority of his career 122-130lbs. Hatton has spent his career at 140-147lbs. These facts we cannot argue with. Thus, Pacquiao is a naturally smaller lower-weight fighter. Cut and dried.

 

Can you repeat it one more time please .....

 

Haven't you embarrassed yourself enough on this thread yet??

Take a box of tissues with you when you hit The Ring website and realize that what you are hoping for cannot happen unless p4p#2 JM Marquez loses to Diaz.

 

no wonder people get annoyed with you cut the **** i ahve said pac is a smaller guy but as mentioned fighting at certain weights through your career doesn't make you that size, you fill out as you get older for a start ande some boxers are betetr at draining weight than other or stay in better shape when not fighting.

 

I refuse to buy the ring and fund the all Golden Boys retirement funds

 

Then continue to keep referring to the p4p rankings wrongly and being laughed at!! :good:good:good

 

If you yourself have calzaghe no.2 then fair enough, i wont argue with anybody's OWN ranking.

But, if you are gonna link to a site, then it has to be the Ring. Im sure Joe's mum has him at No.1 but it doesnt mean diddly.

Your view of the Ring doesnt matter, MY top 10 probably differes from the ring but if im in a debate about the top 10 i cant go of my own rankings can I.

He's Number 3.

 

People get annoyed with me because I stick to the facts and don't fold in the face of your biased opinions?? Well boo hoo.

I posted the actual weights that Pacquiao and Hatton have actually spent their careers fighting at.

You posted that Ricky Hatton was a 135-140lbs fighter, despite the fact that even as a youngster in his very first pro fight, he fought at 140, has never fought lower than that, and has fought often up at 147lbs, and won a world title there.


I'll stick to the facts, you stick to getting annoyed :good

 

hatton does not have the frame of a 140 pound fighter thats the point that is a fact, also he hasn't fought at 147 that often

 

PAC
Joe Calzaghe
Hopkins
JMM
Hatton

 

Yawn.

Hatton does have the frame of a 140 fighter. He didn't have the frame for 147, he does for 140.

But anyway, yet again this still doesn't change any of these facts:


The fact remains that the man was an adult who won a world title at flyweight. He spent the majority of his career 122-130lbs. Hatton has spent his career at 140-147lbs. These facts we cannot argue with. Thus, Pacquiao is a naturally smaller lower-weight fighter. Cut and dried.

 

again is chris byrd a natural heavyweight then ?
Also what is the lowest weight you think pacman could get to at this point in his career and don't come back by posting the same thing again as it makes you look as stupid as the people you have been slating. I am asking for you opinion if you don't want to give it just say so and we will speak no more on the matter.

 

Hatton is a good light welter

Hatton is an average Welter

Agreed?

 

what's that got to do with anything? hattons a very good lww and an average ww