Arum "It's 52-48 or no fight!!

Incorrect troll. The right to free speech (and the right to an opinion) is a fundamental freedom or any decent western democracy so we do! Whether that judgement is correct or not is, in itself, subjective or course but there we go.

By contrast, I would guess you are holed up in an internet cafe in Manila with your every post being checked and edited by the pac-fanatic local police or military!

 

Fights Witter?....and if you mean Hatton, I couldn't give a ****. I just don't like duckers, and Pac has proved to be just that :hey

 

Its us keyboard warriors who ultimately pay the little ****ers wages....so, yes, we do have a right to judge :finger5:finger5

 

[quote="TKO";3286563]Incorrect troll. The right to free speech (and the right to an opinion) is a fundamental freedom or any decent western democracy so we do! Whether that judgement is correct or not is, in itself, subjective or course but there we go.

By contrast, I would guess you are holed up in an internet cafe in Manila with your every post being checked and edited by the pac-fanatic local police or military![/quote]

Errrrr... the right to free speech is only guaranteed if what you say is correct and not falsely based on an inaccurate opinion or fact. That's why people are sued for libel and contempt for that matter.

Now let me guess... you are online somewhere in London where each street corner is beng monitored by government installed CC's... or you are in New York where the NSA is monitoring each word you type in your computer. In any case, a word of caution... don't use the word "blow" to describe a punch otherwise Big Brother might red flag you mate.

 

Actually, 'inaccurate opinions' (if such a thing is logically possible) are protected just as much as 'accurate' ones...

 

[quote="TKO";3286563]Incorrect troll. The right to free speech (and the right to an opinion) is a fundamental freedom or any decent western democracy so we do! Whether that judgement is correct or not is, in itself, subjective or course but there we go.

By contrast, I would guess you are holed up in an internet cafe in Manila with your every post being checked and edited by the pac-fanatic local police or military![/quote]

nope. im currently on my job, playing around, sitting out of my ass and reading your stupid posts

 

No wonder the Filipino GDP is so high...

 

hey Timmy, if pac-Hatton was a cherrypick, we wouldn't be back-reading posts like this today lol

 

Cherry picking eh? Pac almost ducked Hatton

 

jeez, I though it was about Pac-Floyd.

anyway, it was at this point that I realized that Team Pac was a horrible team to deal with. the fight with Hatton almost never got made just because of the stupid purse split.

 

It's crazy how people were arguing that Hatton deserved 50/50 against Pac. The guy didn't even deserve 60/40

 

i could go on all day. :!:

 

That's debatable...Hatton always had a great fan base, added onto the fact that he was the #1 Light Welter at the time.

 

no way either of these guys , with their egos- takes anything less than 50 percent. so 50/50 is what it has to be.

Arum is just posturing making it like they have the upper hand - so that when it comes to do the deal - money thinks he s getting away with something by going 50/50

 

okay, ive made my point. this is for the benefit of the ***** noobs that are running around this board but were obviously still WWE fans and boxing ignoramuses when this fight happened. no need to thank me for your education:hi: