Greater Heavyweight - HOLMES or LEWIS ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bill Butcher, Jan 23, 2009.


  1. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    290
    Apr 18, 2007
    To me, the story of Holmes is largely a story of the upsets which did not happen. He defeated a number of former and future champions. Larry was also a 15 round performer. An all time great does not lose twice in the prime of his career to a single punch from two different mediocre challengers, let alone for a count of ten.
    Lennox would have lost the title defenses Holmes had against Shavers and Snipes (especially Snipes). Larry's superior schooling of Mercer and Ocasio is telling.

    No, Holmes did not give rematches, nor did he take on everybody he should have, but the flip side is that he gave more different challengers title shots than any other heavyweight champion in history.

    Except for the knockdowns, he dominated both Shavers and Snipes. He adapted brilliantly to unexpected surprises, such as his late round body attack against Carl Williams. Holmes circled right as well as any orthodox HW ever has. (Just check out the first Shavers bout.)

    Head to head, peak for peak, Larry decisions Lennox behind the greatest overall jab in HW history.
     
  2. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    I agree with this.

    Holmes always had it hard growing up & had to work extremely hard to get his shot, he says early in his career that he was gonna give title shots to guys like himself that wouldnt have got them, he didnt want them to go thru the BS that he went thru.

    Holmes wasnt afraid of a hard fight, he gave guys like Witherspoon a shot, not because he only had 15 or so fights but because he knew Tim was a good fighter that deserved a shot & likely wouldnt have got one vs other champions... high risk, low reward type of thing.

    The lack of respect showed to Holmes was disgraceful, yet he persevered for more than 7 yrs as champ with 19 or 20 title defences going 48-0... a lot of good champions would have just packed it in.

    Holmes > Lewis

    :good
     
  3. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,517
    3,115
    Feb 17, 2008
    You have to wonder if Larry wasn't the house fighter just what those outcomes of the Snipes & Shavers knockdowns would've been. If he was the guy in there taking on the King fighter, I'm certain those bouts are stopped. He might've even been stopped on that cut in the Smith bout. Different ballgame when one guy is the protected fighter in his matchups.
     
  4. Bill1234

    Bill1234 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,314
    499
    Jan 28, 2007
    I doubt the Snipes one would have been fine, after he hit his head on the corner post, his legs were fine. Smith's cut was worse than Larry's, and Larry still in control of the fight, so there wouldn't be much reason to stop it on Larry's cut.
     
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,914
    44,733
    Apr 27, 2005

    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  6. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Translation: I'm going to give undeserving, unqualified challengers titleshots while keeping the real contenders away from a shot at my belt.


    No, the fight (just like Weaver) was taken because he was inexperienced and seemed like an easy defence. Of course when it turned out completely the opposite, he refused a rematch. If he wasn't afraid, then why didn't he give a very rightfully earned rematch to Witherspoon, or Norton and Weaver for that matter? Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. But he fooled you thrice.
     
  7. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    The only way this statement in any way is true, is that if the referee of the Lewis-McCall fight was during those fights on King's paycheck as well, then it would've read Shavers TKO7 Holmes and Snipes TKO7 Holmes.
     
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,914
    44,733
    Apr 27, 2005
    An all time great shouldn't freeze out the deserving challengers for the last 3 years of his reign either in favour of fighting kids, mugs and light heavyweights.

    As far as claiming Lewis to not be an ATG (and reducing his career to the same old Zakman style junk/rhetoric), well

    :patsch
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,914
    44,733
    Apr 27, 2005
    I know exactly where you are coming from

    :good
     
  10. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    the way the poll is going id how i think afight between them would pan out

    lewis takes an early but close, close lead. with it all in the balance in the last 3 where holmes comes on strong and sarts to pull away
     
  11. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Well it's pretty close - 25 for Lewis to 30 for Holmes .. not my personal opinion, but certainly a very balanced view that shows the quality of the assessment of the average ESB'er. :good
     
  12. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    It is close, but I prefer Holmes with the chief reason being he was not starched by two average top ten fighters.
     
  13. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,145
    13,104
    Jan 4, 2008
    It's very, very close. But right now, the fact that Lewis beat almost everyone that mattered during his era and destroyed/dominated several top contenders in impressive fashion swings it in his favour for me.
     
  14. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,176
    25,424
    Jan 3, 2007

    So in other words, King apparently told the referee, " I'll award you with a bonus in the unlikely event that Lewis gets knocked flat on his ass, gets up, staggers all over the place and falls toward you, IF and ONLY IF, you stop the fight without making it look like a fix....."

    You have a real eye for conspiracy theories Chris.
     
  15. leverage

    leverage Active Member Full Member

    1,372
    15
    Dec 27, 2006
    Overall i'd have to that its a stand-off. Holmes had the longer reign but the fact that he ducked certain deserving opponents and failed to give rematches takes away from his standing.

    Lewis, on the other hand,ducked no one fought everyone around that was deserving of a title shot.