Wladimir Klitschko vs. David Haye

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RUSKULL, Jan 27, 2009.


  1. kano

    kano Member Full Member

    112
    0
    Jun 27, 2006
    I agree haye's too fast and too athletic for wlad who has often depended on those traits himself along with his stregnth and power. haye will KO wlad no dout.
     
  2. suckeggs

    suckeggs Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,625
    5
    Jan 21, 2009
    Ruskull... get your tongue away from Wlads balls man... you will get a nasty rash if you carry on. Like i have said to you in another thread... you clearly have no idea about Hayes boxing ability so i urge you to take your Wlad tinted glasses off and go and do some research... Byrds got faster hands than Haye? LOL... ok mate... you keep believing that
     
  3. Villain

    Villain Active Member Full Member

    1,342
    128
    Jul 27, 2004
    Please god make the odds for this fight mimic ESB.

    It's going to take every bit of athleticism for Haye to even land ANY shots at all. Wlad has too many physical advantages and is a terrible style matchup for Haye. Wlad fights tall, has really good power, probably THE best jab at HW today, and is pretty quick on his back feet for his size. All things designed to use his size and reach advantage and take people out from range. That is Wlads specialty! Haye will need to weather all of that to get inside his own range where he can land his own shots. He probably has the balls to go for it, but I don't think he has the defense to manage it without getting caught nor the chin to keep standing once he does.

    His only chance is to start lightning fast and try to blitz Wlad with forward pressure which sometimes takes Wlad out of his game. If he does that he has a punchers chance. Otherwise it will just be completely one sided.
     
  4. Villain

    Villain Active Member Full Member

    1,342
    128
    Jul 27, 2004
    Actually the younger Byrd WAS a faster puncher that what we have seen from David at Heavyweight so far. He also had a much better chin. Though he had absolutely no power which made him fairly useless against the likes of Wlad. Better to be a little slower and a lot stronger.
     
  5. Jordan

    Jordan Active Member Full Member

    925
    0
    Dec 24, 2008
    Haye, because he is British, Black and Gifted.
     
  6. Azriel

    Azriel Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,958
    0
    May 8, 2007
    Here's my 2 cents (Sorry for stealing your mojo 0.02$);

    Wladimir Haye
    Height: 6'6" 1/2 6'3"
    Arm Length: 81" 78"
    Last fight Weight: 244Lbs 215Lbs
    Chin: Suspect Suspect
    Speed: Good Very Good
    Power: Good Good
    Boxing abilities: Very good Good

    Each have their strength, each have their weaknesses. They are both champions, one at HW, the other at Cruiser. They usually have good game plans but the edge goes to Klit because he is VERY good at using his height advantage.

    So for me, Klit should win this one even though I would love for Haye to win it. Haye never fought good fighters at HW where Klit has. So, it's the first one to crack one on the other one's chin basically. And because Klit uses his height so well, he should be the first one to do it.
     
  7. SwollenGoat

    SwollenGoat deicide banned

    2,158
    0
    May 5, 2006
    Best

    post

    ever.



    :lol:
     
  8. The Clan

    The Clan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,498
    2,081
    Nov 11, 2007
    Wlad s jab won't work against an opponent who goes side to side as fast as Haye does.

    While Klit will come straight on and square Haye will move lateral and create angles.

    Hayes speed will be the key, not just hand speed but footwork and movement which will open Wlad up.

    We know that Wlad is chinny but we don't know yet whether Haye's extra weight has improved his ability to take a shot.

    If Wlad lands a big right he might win but I'm taking Haye to have the tools to open up WK and the punch to drop him.
     
  9. suckeggs

    suckeggs Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,625
    5
    Jan 21, 2009
    Byrd was fast.. i am not denying that... for the heavyweight scene at the time he looked lightening... whether he is faster than Haye or not is another argument altogether
     
  10. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
    Wlad is faster than Haye.

    Better movement, better Jab, better footwork. Wlad is a complete heavyweight fighter.

    He wil win by KO in 7 rounds.
     
  11. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    This.

    I'm rooting for Haye though.
     
  12. suckeggs

    suckeggs Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,625
    5
    Jan 21, 2009
    Now that is the least biased, non nuthugging post i have ever seen... congratulations:happy

    By the way that was my attempt at sarcasm... Wlad faster than Haye... haha... ****ing classic :yep
     
  13. Monstar

    Monstar The Future.. Full Member

    11,166
    0
    Oct 10, 2007
    Wlad's faster then The HayeMATRIX?...Wlad who?
     
  14. suckeggs

    suckeggs Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,625
    5
    Jan 21, 2009
    Sorry - i was so busy laughing at the faster comment that i completely missed the 'better movement, better footwork' bit... man please tell me you was joking... There is a reason people call Wlad a robot and it isn't for his dancing technique

    I'll admit i'm not always the most diplomatic commentor when the discussion is regarding one of my favourite fighters but this is on a whole new level...
     
  15. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    I bet you really do suck Heuvos..............Haye's Heuvos. :cool:

    I guess Haye looked fast against the Great Monte Barrett huh? Smooth & with great technique too. Good luck with that.