1920-1940: The great era of modernisation of boxing technique

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bokaj, Jan 31, 2009.


  1. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,111
    13,053
    Jan 4, 2008
    I know that everyone won't agree, but to my mind boxing technique took a great leap forwards from about 1915-1920 and for 20, 25 years onwards.

    So, do you agree with me? And if so, why did it come about? Was it the advent of amateur boxing, higher professionalisation of the sport, that the sport catched up to the use of gloves with a bit of lag, or something else?

    Also, do you see any evolution of boxing technique since the 1940's? And if so, which fighters have been the most influential do you think?

    In the post-war era I'd personally name Archie Moore as the perhaps most influential boxer. His use of upperbody movement and angles to slip and deflect blows as economically as possible have had a great impact. Just look at Toney today.
     
  2. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    brilliant idea for a thread

    i would agree with you the 20s-40s was a learning period for boxing technique however jack johnson was extremly skillfull in the 1900s
     
  3. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,111
    13,053
    Jan 4, 2008
    Thank you. While I feel fairly certain of the assesments I made in the opening post, I'm very aware that my knowledge pales to that of many posters here, so I really want to hear everyone's take on the evolution of boxing.
     
  4. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    your probably more knowledgeable than me on boxing so thats about all ill say on it
     
  5. Bill1234

    Bill1234 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,314
    499
    Jan 28, 2007
    I think punching technique stopped evolving to any major degree around the start of Joe Louis's era. Also, I think the more modern high guard started in the late 1920's or so, and that is still being changed and perfected.
     
  6. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    I agree with this thread. I believe from around the late 30's to the early 40's was basically the start of the modern era from a technical standpoint, with certain pioneers helping it along beforehand.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,568
    27,197
    Feb 15, 2006
    I disagree.

    It is not so much that you have got the wrong end of the stick but that you have focused on the stick and overlooked the tree.

    Boxing is the sport where everything has happened before.

    I think the biggest changes took place between 1860 and 1880. I also think that most aspects of what we call gloved boxing technique came allong before the widespread use of boxing gloves.

    You could be forgiven for asuming that the introduction of gloves prompted the evolution of boxing technique but in many ways it was the other way round.
     
  8. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    you cant say max bear or jess willard for example have the punch technique of say Wladimir Klitshko or Lamon Brewster
     
  9. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    They easily have the technique of a Sam Peter though.
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,568
    27,197
    Feb 15, 2006
    No but they were both particularly bad even by the standards of their own eras.

    Before them you had guys like Joe Gans, Benny Leonard, and Mike Gibbons
     
  11. Arka

    Arka New Member Full Member

    0
    7
    Sep 26, 2008
    Well Louis learned how to really punch from the great Jack Blackburn.
    People used to compare Louis' punching technique to Joe Gans. :D
    Joe Gans in turn refined his boxing technique from sparring with Fitzsimmons.
    etc etc.......

    The concept of leverage and force of a punch,are physical concepts and should have been familiar to even 18th century prize-fighters.
     
  12. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,111
    13,053
    Jan 4, 2008
    Well, while I very much respect your knowledge, we're never going to find common ground here.

    Funny thing is that, just after I'd posted this thread, ESPN did a special with fights from great LW champs ranging from Benny Leonard to Roberto Duran. Even though Leonard looked very good in many ways, there was no doubt that they became progressively more refined.

    The punching technique was more or less already there with Leonard, but there we significant improvements when it came to guard and upper body movement. For me it was just as plain as day.
     
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,568
    27,197
    Feb 15, 2006
    Unfortunately you cant get a complete DVD boxed set of Leonards fights today so we might not necisarily be seing his full repatoir.

    You mention his low guard and that is one of the few areas where there has been a tangible change. Boxing manuals from 1900 recoment a low guard in order to defend against body punches better and you will noice that old timers adopt a higher guard when they go into a crouch because their body is protected by the crouch.

    In all however I think that there is less diference in terms of technique between Jem Mace and Floyd Mayweather than there is between Jem Mace and Sam Hurst who he won the title from.
     
  14. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,111
    13,053
    Jan 4, 2008
    Do anyone think that for example Duran and Sugra Ray Leonard have a claim to be named among the innovators?

    Sure, you can see the origins in Duran's style as early as Dempsey, but didn't he take it to another level? And as for Leonard, I feel that he to an extent took the loose, relaxed and personalised style of prime Ali and combined it with very solid fundamentals. Whitaker is a later example of this, I would say.

    And Hagler, did he bring anything new?
     
  15. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,111
    13,053
    Jan 4, 2008
    Don't know enough of Mace and Hurst to pass a verdict. But in general I think that the defensive technique has been clearly refined since those days.

    Fighter that also merits a mention as innovators are Charles and Walcott. I feel that they introduced more footwork and more upperbody movement in the HW division. The offensive arsenal haven't improved much, or at all, since Louis, but I belive that the 50's saw an improvement of defensive capabilities in the division. And this probably have a lot to do with Charles and Walcott, as well as Moore.