Degale or Sutherland ?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by iceman, Feb 2, 2009.


  1. moorser

    moorser Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,768
    153
    Jan 8, 2009
    stherland is only 26 .
     
  2. bored

    bored rent boy Full Member

    1,774
    0
    May 19, 2008
    Yeah I suppose so, just seems when the next guy he's fighting will more than likely be an easy win after 2 or 3 rounds he might as well take it sooner rather than later and build up some quick pro experience. 26 doesn't leave him too long so I would like to see him every couple of months but then I'd like every fighter to fight every couple of months.
     
  3. fra

    fra Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,733
    43
    Jan 11, 2008
    i think when or if sutherland meets degale in the pro ranks...degale could end of flat on his back looking at the stars buzzing round his head...but u have a point when u say sutherland could b fighting more regularly ...maloney could have had darren out about 2 times since his pro debut:good
     
  4. Guy

    Guy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,597
    0
    Dec 15, 2008
    When De-Gale and Sutherland first met in the Amateurs it was a De-Gale won but it was a close match 22-23 but when they met in the Olympics De-Gale won 10-3.
    I know the Pro's are a different kettle of fish but it seems that De-Gale has the tools and style to deal with Sutherland and has his number so to speak.
     
  5. fra

    fra Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,733
    43
    Jan 11, 2008
    no mate your wrong there...sutherland and degale fought each other 6 times in the amateurs sutherland won 4 times degale twice..but obviously degale won when it really mattered in the olympics...but i dont think degale has sutherlands number at all:good
     
  6. bored

    bored rent boy Full Member

    1,774
    0
    May 19, 2008
    I would agree now, Sutherland looks a lot stronger than DeGale. DeGale is promoted by Warren though so the match up won't happen any time soon.
     
  7. Guy

    Guy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,597
    0
    Dec 15, 2008
    Thanks for the low down mate :) do you know the scores for those ?