Pac went the right path as far as money goes, but greatness off of old names alone is not enough for me. I need a bit more from Pac to judge him. He has time.
It's not a queation of "being too young or too old" . . . it's a question of how much money is gonna be on the table for Pac. :deal
Your time is up Pac? Do you ******s ever learn from what you're saying?, isn't that the same **** a bunch of gay ass cabdrivers over here said about Margarito for two years straight even after his ass whopping to Paul Williams? Valero is nothing but another Margarito, only difference is Valero probably has a better resume. Signing with TOP RANK means he will take the most feared beast title very soon, you think Pac gives a ****? If Valero beats the winner of JMM/Diaz then he is definitely worthy of fighting Pac. But can he make the move in weight?, Pacquiao sure as hell won't move down for him. By the way, Pac by KO and early.
You're just a sole entity to judge. It don't matter whatever your judgement gonna be. Judge yourself! :hat
What? Neither side of that statement makes any sense. Valero fights nothing like Margarito (I could see a Urango comp, though Valero's more talented and less tested than Urango), and Margarito's resume is a thousand times better than Valero's.
Today, there are a lot of ******s who say Pav ko's Valero early, and they aren't giving anything except their opinion...nothing more. The one thing I will never ever do is care what those ******s post when the obvious seems obvious to them because it isn't obvious to me. Anyone can win an argument saying PAc beats the living shite out of Valero, and early on any forum. Look: PAc will kill Valero! Wtf does that prove when they haven't fought yet???