Sugar Ray Leonard- "Joe was a special kind of fighter."

No. ppl don't rate him as an ATG because his Resume is weak as hell..... And to defend the Yanks here. Most give Mayweather **** for missing a couple of fighters and his Record is twice that of's Joe's, where does that leave your Argument...

 

atsch The guy was faking low blows and got a long unfair rest. I can't respect that.

 

I know enough about boxing to keep my bum ass out of the ring and in my arm chair where i'm safe and pain free!

 

No because if he was American... I doubt he would have got away with defending his WBO belt for 9 years against the utter tripe he fought.... The best name out of these years id Reid for gods sake

On the face of it 46-0 sounds good... but when you lok closer it doesn't stand up to scrutiny

 

He's a Brit! :deal

Yes i suppose you are right. The yanks would have gone a bit easier on him.

 

Bremmer, Joe is 46 and 0 and floyds resume doesnt impress me altho i admit he is an ATG and has nothing to prove at his weight so thats where i leave my argument with you and i dont rly like talking to ya so meh.

and tuffin dude you made me laugh there but im young and i like a good scrap cos ive been in a few and boxing is legal and i cud do a margarito on some unlucky chump haha!

 

Valuev was 44-0

 

OK..... so if Floyds resume doesn't impress you, what do you think of Joe's ??

 

Well said, Ray. :good

 

I think joes is great. Fought a load of former world champs whilst defending his WBO and beating Lacy, Bika, Kessler, Hopkins, Jones etc. but thats all im saying now so night night

 

:rofl

 

But you agree that Joe is an 'elite' boxer?

 

Floyd's resume is far superior to Joe's, even the haterest of Floyd haters will say that.

 

Look I'm not a "Hater" of any boxer.... but I'm a realist, and I look at things and give my own opinion. And I rate Joe as a HOF boxer and 5-7 top British fighter.... But he is no top ATG imo.

Yes he was an Elite fighter

 

lol, good one