Jermain Taylor vs. Carl Froch - WBC 168 lbs Title

Taylor by late stoppage

 

is everybody forgetting that taylor is a knockout puncher? Taylor 5 ko

 

Your forgetting Froch's got a chin like granite, never been put down or even looked like hurt. Froch wins this one by late stoppage.

 

edit

 

my thoughts are the title thread should read carl froch v jermain taylor
champion the challenger.
​

 

Taylor has never had aa 12 rounds fight where he did not had to give up a few rounds. He just can't go 12 hard rounds. He's the more skilled fighter but his chin is suspect. So, not so good cardio and not so good chin = Froch late tko.

 

My guess is that most, if not all of the people who voted Froch by TKO/KO are from England or Europe. Pretty hilarious.

 

you has fruch gone up against thats worth mentioning

 

? When is the last time Taylor koed someone who was not a bum ? :think

 

thats because he was restless, he looked like dog****. but in that pavlik rematch he looked good

 

pascals chin is obviously good, and froch is arguably a harder hitter than pavilik p4p, i feel as long as froch doesnt fight on pure adrenaline like his last fight and keeps his hand reasonably high he can wear taylor down for a late stoppage

 

true, but he almost took out pav in the first fight, so hes still a heavy puncher

 

Taylor is going to really put a hurting on Froch.... He is much too fast and strong, Pascal is quick but lacks power, Taylor is a MUCH better fighter than Pascal on every aspect, Froch is going to get TKO'd Late. Barring some Haymaker that catches Taylor blind, I see no chance of Froch winning this fight.

 

True, but you need to look at his more recent performances ... I think losing to Pavlik really did help Taylor in the long run.

 

Maybe because they've actually seen him fight more than once, unlike most of the Americans voting against him.