Who beat Steve Cunnigham more convincingly?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by andyZOR, Feb 15, 2009.


Page 1 of 2
  1. andyZOR

    andyZOR Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,049
    2
    Feb 28, 2007
    Wlodarczyk in the first fight or Adamek?
     
    andyZOR, Feb 15, 2009
    andyZOR, Feb 15, 2009
    #1
  2. CASH_718

    CASH_718 "You ****ed Healy?" Full Member

    18,614
    8
    Apr 10, 2005
    I think Cunningham clearly won the first Wlodarczyk fight. So Adamek.
     
    CASH_718, Feb 15, 2009
    CASH_718, Feb 15, 2009
    #2
  3. andyZOR

    andyZOR Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,049
    2
    Feb 28, 2007

    Lol no way. I have to disagree.


    That fight was a robbery on one judges score card. How the **** did that American judge give Cunnigham 119-109?!

    Thats a disgrace. Wlodarczyk controlled the fight and landed the better and cleaner shots. Wlodarczyk won on my cards on about 3 / 4rounds.

    Most people on this forum claim Adamek didn't even win the fight vs Steve even with the knockdowns!! Yet no one was complaining, cept Steve himself, when Wlodarczyk whooped that ass.
     
    andyZOR, Feb 15, 2009
    andyZOR, Feb 15, 2009
    #3
  4. bmf95b

    bmf95b Boxing Fan Full Member

    5,268
    11
    Jan 9, 2007
    Adamek....

    By FAR !!
     
    bmf95b, Feb 15, 2009
    bmf95b, Feb 15, 2009
    #4
  5. andyZOR

    andyZOR Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,049
    2
    Feb 28, 2007
    bump
     
    andyZOR, Feb 22, 2009
    andyZOR, Feb 22, 2009
    #5
  6. Taylex

    Taylex Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,885
    1
    Oct 15, 2007
    I thought Steve was robbed against Wlodarczyk
     
    Taylex, Feb 22, 2009
    Taylex, Feb 22, 2009
    #6
  7. andyZOR

    andyZOR Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,049
    2
    Feb 28, 2007
    :lol:

    Yes there was a robbery that night, and that was the 119-109 scorecard from the American judge for Steve.
     
    andyZOR, Feb 22, 2009
    andyZOR, Feb 22, 2009
    #7
  8. pirlo

    pirlo Active Member Full Member

    1,301
    0
    Jul 14, 2007
    Adamek is the only man who beat Steve.
     
    pirlo, Feb 22, 2009
    pirlo, Feb 22, 2009
    #8
  9. rapidHOOK

    rapidHOOK The Champ is HERE Full Member

    3,658
    0
    Aug 31, 2008
    yes he was robbed in the first fight for sure

    that was the main reason the second one happend
     
    rapidHOOK, Feb 22, 2009
    rapidHOOK, Feb 22, 2009
    #9
  10. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    Adamek.

    I too thought Cunningham won the first Wlodarczyk fight.
     
    TommyV, Feb 22, 2009
    TommyV, Feb 22, 2009
    #10
  11. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    not even dude,

    There are only a handful of us here who had it for Cunningham. None of us are crying robbery but we get bashed for our scorecards.
     
    Boom_Boom, Feb 22, 2009
    Boom_Boom, Feb 22, 2009
    #11
  12. andyZOR

    andyZOR Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,049
    2
    Feb 28, 2007
    Elaborate how he was robbed?

    Wlodarczyk kept the tempo, landed the cleaner shots, and even had him stunned a few times. Wlodarczyk was never hurt at all in the fight. Steve was frustrated at Wlodarczyks punches and kept clinching once he found out how hard he hit.


    Everytime Krzysiek hit him, Steve would ALWAYS clinch. Not even power hits either, just like, even jabs somtimes. Same thing for Steve too, he threw like 1 punch and then clinch. It was like watching a John Ruiz fight.

    Im sure as hell tho, if Steve fought like he did vs Adamek, against Krzysiek he would of got knocked out that night in Poland, im pretty sure. I don't think Adamek hits harder than Krzysiek, and you see what Adamek did to him 3 times.
     
    andyZOR, Feb 22, 2009
    andyZOR, Feb 22, 2009
    #12
  13. rumour24tiger

    rumour24tiger Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,718
    2
    Jan 27, 2006
    I had Wlod winning the 1st fight. He is a poor man's Dariusz Michalczewski, same style, same stance, but nowhere near the strength or power. Cunningham was poor in that fight. But he set things right in the rematch, really winning convincingly.

    Adamek beat Cunningham better, because he had him down 3 times in an otherwise close fight.
     
    rumour24tiger, Feb 22, 2009
    rumour24tiger, Feb 22, 2009
    #13
  14. andyZOR

    andyZOR Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,049
    2
    Feb 28, 2007
    :thumbsup
     
    andyZOR, Feb 22, 2009
    andyZOR, Feb 22, 2009
    #14
  15. rapidHOOK

    rapidHOOK The Champ is HERE Full Member

    3,658
    0
    Aug 31, 2008
    okay robbery is a big word, it was a close fight
    the reason i had cunningham winning that fight was simply because he was the busier fighter, he threw more punches even though not all were landing cleanly or getting blocked
    wlod did well as he threw some power punches but they did not land throughout the fight
    so it would boil down to cunninghams activity or wlods phewer but more potent punching

    i had it 115-113 but cunningham cleary desearved the nod
     
    rapidHOOK, Feb 22, 2009
    rapidHOOK, Feb 22, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 2